Hysteresis effects in geological CO2 sequestration processes: A case study on Aneth demonstration site, Utah, USA

1Institute of Hydrogeology & Environmental Geology, Shijiazhuang 050061, China. 2 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Utah.

摘要

- /
- /
- /
Abstract: Realistic models for saturation, capillary pressure and relative permeability s-pc-kr relations are essential for accurate predictions in multiphase flow simulations. The primary object of this work is to investigate their influence on geological CO2 sequestration processes. In this work, the hysteresis effects on simulation results predicting geological CO2 storage are investigated on a synthetic 2D model and a geological setting built according to Aneth demonstration site. Simulation results showed that hysteretic relative permeability model should be included while the residual trapping mechanism is under investigation. The effects of hysteresis and WAG schemes were studied with a series of numerical simulations on a geological setting based on Aneth site. Our simulations demonstrate that the hysteresis effect is strong on residual trapping mechanisms and there is no significant effects of alternative WAG schemes for long term residual trapping in our conceptual model. The effects of WAG schemes and hysteresis are weak on dissolution trapping mechanisms.
- CO2 storage /
- Relative permeability /
- Capillary pressure /
- Hysteresis

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

Orr Jr F M. 2004. Storage of carbon dioxide in geologic formations. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 56(9):90-97.

Hammond G, Lichtner P, Lu C. 2007. Subsurface multiphase flow and multicomponent reactive transport modeling using high-performance computing. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 78(1):12-25.

Land C S. 1968. Calculation of imbibition relative permeability for two and three-phase flow from rock properties. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 8(2):149-156.

Lu C, Lichtner P, C Lu. 2006. Numerical investigation of CO2 sequestration in geologic media Using the massively parallel computer code PFLOTRAN. Ajr American Journal of Roentgenology, 191(2):313-20.

Hitchon B, Eds. 1996. Aquifer disposal of carbon dioxide. Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada: Geoscience publishing.

LU Chuan, LI Long, et al. 2014. Capillary pressure and relative permeability model uncertainties in simulations of geological CO2 sequestration. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2(2):1-17.

Skauge A, Sorbie K. 2014. Status of fluid flow mechanisms for miscible and immiscible WAG. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, 59(8).

Bachu S, Bennion B. 2008. Effects of in-situ conditions on relative permeability charac-teristics of CO2 brine systems. Environment Geology, 54(8):1707-1722.

Lichtner P C. 2001. Flotran: User manual. Los Alamos, NM, Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Balay S, Buschelman K, et al. 2004. PETSc users manual, Argonne National Laboratory.

Kumar A, Noh M H, et al. 2004. Reservoir simulation of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers. SPE Journal, 10(3):336-348.

Rathfelder K, Abriola L M. 1998. The influence of capillarity in numerical modeling of organic liquid redistribution in two-phase systems. Advances in Water Resources, 21(2): 159-170.

Kaluarachchi J J, Parker J C. 1992. Multiphase flow with a simplified model for oil entrap-ment. Transport in Porous Media, 7(1):1-14.

Lenhard R J, Parker J C. 1987. A model for hysteretic constitutive relations governing multiphase flow: 2. Permeability-saturation relations. Water Resource Research, 23(12): 2197-2206.

Demond A H and Roberts P V. 2010. An examination of relative permeability relations for two-phase flow in porous media. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resource Association, 23(4):617-628.

Mahzai P, Sohrabi M. 2017. An improved approach for estimation of flow and hysteresis parameters applicable to WAG experiments. Fuel, 197:359-372.

Parker J C, Lenhard R J. 1987. A model for hysteretic constitutive relations governing multiphase flow: Saturation-pressure relations. Water Resource Research, 23(12): 2187-2196.

Bachu S, Gunter W D, Perkins E H. 1994. Aquifer disposal of CO2: Hydrodynamic and mineral trapping. Energy Conversion & Management, 35(4):269-279.

Doughty C. 2007. Modeling geologic storage of carbon dioxide: Comparison of non-hysteretic and hysteretic characteristic curves. Energy Conversion & Management, 48(6):1768-1781.

Holt T, Jensen I J, Lindeburg E. 1995. Underground storage of CO2 in aquifers and oil reservoirs. Energy Conversion & Management, 36:535-538.

Span R, Wanger W. 1996. A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point temperature to 1 100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 25(6):1509.

Juanes R, Spiteri E J, et al. 2006. Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on the geological CO2 storage. Water Resource Research, 42(12):395-397.

Gerhard J I, Kueper B H. 2003. Relative permeability characteristics necessary for simulating DNAPL infiltration, redistribution and immobilization in saturated porous media. Water Resources Research, 39(8):SBH7-1.

[1]	Ying-nan Zhang, Yan-guang Liu, Kai Bian, Guo-qiang Zhou, Xin Wang, Mei-hua Wei2024: Development status and prospect of underground thermal energy storage technology, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12, 92-108. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280008
[2]	Xiu-yan Wang, Lin Sun, Shuai-wei Wang, Ming-yu Wang, Jin-qiu Li, Wei-chao Sun, Jing-jing Wang, Xi Zhu, He Di2023: Development and application of multi-field coupled high-pressure triaxial apparatus for soil, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 308-316. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280025
[3]	Song Chao, Liu Man, Dong Qiu-yao, Zhang Lin, Wang Pan, Chen Hong-yun, Ma Rong2022: Variation characteristics of CO₂ in a newly-excavated soil profile, Chinese Loess Plateau: Excavation-induced ancient soil organic carbon decomposition, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 19-32. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.01.003
[4]	HAO Hong-bo, LV Jie, CHEN Yan-mei, WANG Chuan-zi, HUANG Xiao-rui2021: Research advances in non-Darcy flow in low permeability media, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 83-92. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.01.008
[5]	Ma Xin, Wen Dong-guang, Yang Guo-dong, Li Xu-feng, Diao Yu-jie, Dong Hai-hai, Cao Wei, Yin Shu-guo, Zhang Yan-mei2021: Potential assessment of CO₂ geological storage based on injection scenario simulation: A case study in eastern Junggar Basin, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 279-291. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.04.002
[6]	LIU Feng, WANG Gui-ling, ZHANG Wei, YUE Chen, TAO Li-bo2020: Using TOUGH2 numerical simulation to analyse the geothermal formation in Guide basin, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 328-337. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.04.003
[7]	ZHANG Bing, GAO Ye-xin, FENG Xin, ZHANG Ya-zhe, LIU Ji-chao, ZHANG Ying-ping2020: Experimental study on height simulation of capillary fringe, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 108-117. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.02.002
[8]	ZENG Tu-rong2019: Research on basic characteristics of 2H, 18O and 14C in geothermal fluid in Guangdong Province, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 42-52. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.01.004
[9]	Muhammad Nauman Malik, Mehdi Murtuza, Iqbal Asif, Bakar Muhammad Saifullah Abu, Brahim Aissa, Dk Nur Afiqah Jalwati Puteri, Amer Farhan Rafique2019: Adaptive state estimation of groundwater contaminant boundary input flux in a 2-dimensional aquifer, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 373-382. doi: DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.04.008
[10]	Nouayti Abderrahime, Khattach Driss, Hilali Mohamed, Nouayti Nordine2019: Mapping potential areas for groundwater storage in the High Guir Basin (Morocco):Contribution of remote sensing and geographic information system, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 309-322. doi: DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.04.002
[11]	MA Zhi-yuan, XU Yong, ZHAI Mei-jing, WU Min2017: Clogging mechanism in the process of reinjection of used geothermal water: A simulation research on Xianyang No.2 reinjection well in a super-deep and porous geothermal reservoir, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 311-325.
[12]	LI Duo, WEI Ai-hua2016: Analysis of influence of the power plant ash storage yard on groundwater environment, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 35-40.
[13]	FENG Guan-hong, XU Tian-fu, ZHU Hui-xing2016: Dynamics of fluid and heat flow in a CO2-based injection-production geothermal system, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 377-388.
[14]	LI Hui, HAN Zhan-tao, MA Chun-xiao, GUI Jian-ye2015: Comparison of 1,2,3-Trichloropropane reduction and oxidation by nanoscale zero-valent iron, zinc and activated persulfate, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 156-163.
[15]	LIU Yan-guang, ZHU Xi, YUE Gao-fan, LIN Wen-jing, HE Yu-jiang, WANG Gui-ling2015: A review of fluid flow and heat transfer in the CO2-EGS, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 170-175.
[16]	Chang-li LIU, Chao SONG, Hong-bing HOU, Xiu-yan WANG, Yun ZHANG, Jun-kun WANG, Jian-mei JIANG, Li-xin PEI, Bo SONG2014: The Impact of Human Activities on CO2 Intake by Carbonate Weathering: A Case Study of Conglin Karst Ridge-trough at Fuling Town, Chongqing, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 29-38.
[17]	ZHANG Wei2014: Establishment of an assessment method for site-scale suitability of CO2 geological storage, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 19-25.
[18]	LU Chuan, LI Long, LIU Yan-guang, WANG Gui-ling2014: Capillary Pressure and Relative Permeability Model Uncertainties in Simulations of Geological CO2 Sequestration, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 1-17.
[19]	Tong Yuanqing, Liu Li, Wang? Xiuming, Li Yingzhi2013: Revision of Handbook of Hydrogeology (2nd Edition), Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 41-47.