A combined method using Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) and Finite Volume Method (FVM) to simulate geothermal reservoirs in Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS)

Xiang Gao; Tai-lu Li; Yu-wen Qiao; Yao Zhang; Ze-yu Wang

doi:10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280011

Volume 12 Issue 2

Jun. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering > 2024 > 12(2): 132-146

Gao X, Li TL, Qiao YW, et al. 2024. A combined method using Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) and Finite Volume Method (FVM) to simulate geothermal reservoirs in Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS). Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12(2): 132-146 doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280011

Citation:

PDF( 3336 KB)

A combined method using Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) and Finite Volume Method (FVM) to simulate geothermal reservoirs in Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS)

doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280011

1.
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China

More Information

Corresponding author: litailu19821028@163.com
Received Date: 2023-10-07
Accepted Date: 2024-04-13

Available Online: 2024-06-10

Publish Date: 2024-06-30

Abstract

Abstract

With the development of industrial activities, global warming has accelerated due to excessive emission of CO₂. Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) utilizes deep geothermal heat for power generation. Although porous medium theory is commonly employed to model geothermal reservoirs in EGS, Hot Dry Rock (HDR) presents a challenge as it consists of impermeable granite with zero porosity, potentially distorting the physical interpretation. To address this, the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) is employed to simulate CO₂ flow within geothermal reservoirs and the Finite Volume Method (FVM) to solve the energy conservation equation for temperature distribution. This combined method of LBM and FVM is implemented using MATLAB. The results showed that the Reynolds numbers (Re) of 3,000 and 8,000 lead to higher heat extraction rates from geothermal reservoirs. However, higher Re values may accelerate thermal breakthrough, posing challenges to EGS operation. Meanwhile, non-equilibrium of density in fractures becomes more pronounced during the system's life cycle, with non-Darcy's law becoming significant at Re values of 3,000 and 8,000. Density stratification due to buoyancy effects significantly impacts temperature distribution within geothermal reservoirs, with buoyancy effects at Re=100 under gravitational influence being noteworthy. Larger Re values (3,000 and 8,000) induce stronger forced convection, leading to more uniform density distribution. The addition of proppant negatively affects heat transfer performance in geothermal reservoirs, especially in single fractures. Practical engineering considerations should determine the quantity of proppant through detailed numerical simulations.
- Lattice boltzmann method,
- Finite volume method,
- Enhanced geothermal system,
- Geothermal reservoir,
- Proppant,
- Re,
- Heat extraction rate

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

Al Balushi F, Zhang Q, Dahi Taleghani A. 2023. Improving enhanced geothermal systems performance using adaptive fracture conductivity. Applied Thermal Engineering, 233: 121206. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121206.

Avanthi Isaka BL, Ranjith PG, Rathnaweera TD. 2019. The use of super-critical carbon dioxide as the working fluid in enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs): A review study. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 36: 100547. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2019.100547.

Babamahmoudi S, Saeedi Dehaghani AH, Hosseini Moghadam A. 2023. Absolute permeability assessment of porous structures under different boundary conditions using lattice Boltzmann method. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 221: 211357. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoen.2022.211357.

Cheng Q, Wang X, Ghassemi A. 2019. Numerical simulation of reservoir stimulation with reference to the Newberry EGS. Geothermics, 77: 327−343. DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2018.09.011.

Ding Q, Huang J, Chen J, et al. 2024. Climate warming, renewable energy consumption and rare earth market: Evidence from the United States. Energy, 290: 130276. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130276.

Dokmak H, Faraj K, Faraj J, et al. 2024. Geothermal systems classification, coupling, and hybridization: A recent comprehensive review. Energy and Built Environment, 1-20.

Ghassemi A, Nygren A, Cheng A. 2008. Effects of heat extraction on fracture aperture: A poro–thermoelastic analysis. Geothermics, 37: 525−539. DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.06.001.

Guo Z, Zheng C, Shi B. 2002. An extrapolation method for boundary conditions in lattice Boltzmann method. Physics of Fluids, 14: 2007−2010. DOI: 10.1063/1.1471914.

He X, Zou Q, Luo LS, et al. 1997. Analytic solutions of simple flows and analysis of nonslip boundary conditions for the Lattice Boltzmann BGK model. Journal of Statistical Physics, 87: 115−136. DOI: 10.1007/BF02181482.

Hu Z, Xu T, Moore J, et al. 2022. Investigation of the effect of different injection schemes on fracture network patterns in hot dry rocks - A numerical case study of the FORGE EGS site in Utah. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 97: 104346. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104346.

Jiao K, Han D, Li J, et al. 2021. A novel LBM-DEM based pore-scale thermal-hydro-mechanical model for the fracture propagation process. Computer and Geotechnics, 139: 104418. DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104418.

Krüger T, Kusumaatmaja H, Kuzmin A, et al. 2016. The Lattice Boltzmann Method-Principles and practice. Springer International Publish.

Li S, Wang S, Tang H. 2022. Stimulation mechanism and design of enhanced geothermal systems: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 155: 111914. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111914.

Li T, Han D, Yang F, et al. 2021. Modeling study of the thermal-hydraulic-mechanical coupling process for EGS based on the framework of EDFM and XFEM. Geothermics, 89: 101953. DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101953.

Liao J, Hu K, Mehmood F, et al. 2023. Embedded discrete fracture network method for numerical estimation of long-term performance of CO₂-EGS under THM coupled framework. Energy, 285: 128734. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128734.

Luo Z, Wu Y, Zhou L, et al. 2021. Trade-off between vegetation CO₂ sequestration and fossil fuel-related CO₂ emissions: A case study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay area of China. Sustain Cities and Society, 74: 103195. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103195.

Moradi I, D'Orazio A. 2023. Lattice Boltzmann Method Pore-scale simulation of fluid flow and heat transfer in porous media: Effect of size and arrangement of obstacles into a channel. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 152: 83−103. DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.04.007.

Mukuhira Y, Ito T, Asanuma H, et al. 2020. Evaluation of flow paths during stimulation in an EGS reservoir using microseismic information. Geothermics, 87: 101843. DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101843.

Olasolo P, Juárez MC, Morale MP, et al. 2016. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56: 133−144. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.031.

Rohit RV, Kiplangat DC, Veena R, et al. 2023. Tracing the evolution and charting the future of geothermal energy research and development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 184: 113531. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113531.

Sun R, Shen J, Grasby SE, et al. 2022. CO₂ buildup drove global warming, the Marinoan deglaciation, and the genesis of the Ediacaran cap carbonates. Precambrian Research, 383: 106891. DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2022.106891.

Sun ZX, Zhang X, Xu Y, et al. 2017. Numerical simulation of the heat extraction in EGS with thermal-hydraulic-mechanical coupling method based on discrete fractures model. Energy, 120: 20−33. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.046.

Qian YH, D'Humières D, Lallemand P. 1992. Lattice BGK Models for Navier-Stokes Equation. Europhys Lett, 17: 479. DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/17/6/001.

Yao J, Zhang X, Sun Z, et al. 2018. Numerical simulation of the heat extraction in 3D-EGS with thermal-hydraulic-mechanical coupling method based on discrete fractures model. Geothermics, 74: 19−34. DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.12.005.

Zhang EY, Wen DG, Wang GL, et al. 2022. The first power generation test of hot dry rock resources exploration and production demonstration project in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai Province, China. China Geology, 5(3): 372−382. DOI: 10.31035/cg2022038.

Zhang W, Han D, Wang B, et al. 2023. Thermal-hydraulic-mechanical-chemical modeling and simulation of an enhanced geothermal system based on the framework of extended finite element methods - Embedded discrete fracture model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415: 137630. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137630.

Zhong C, Xu T, Yuan Y, et al. 2022. The feasibility of clean power generation from a novel dual-vertical-well enhanced geothermal system (EGS): A case study in the Gonghe Basin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344: 131109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131109.

Zhou D, Tatomir A, Niemi A, et al. 2022. Study on the influence of randomly distributed fracture aperture in a fracture network on heat production from an enhanced geothermal system (EGS). Energy, 250: 123781. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123781.

Zou Q, He X. 1997. On pressure and velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann BGK model. Physics of Fluids, 9: 1591−1598. DOI: 10.1063/1.869307.

2305-7068/© Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)

Relative Articles

[1]	Yu-kun Sun, Feng Liu, Hua-jun Wang, Xin-zhi Gao, 2022: Numerical simulation of operation performance on production and injection of a double well geothermal system in Kailu Basin, Inner Mongolia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 196-208. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.02.008
[2]	ZHANG Ying, LUO Jun, FENG Jian-yun, 2020: Characteristics of geothermal reservoirs and utilization of geothermal resources in the southeastern coastal areas of China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 134-142. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.02.005
[3]	Yan WANG, Yan-guang LIU, Kai BIAN, Hong-liang ZHANG, Shen-jun QIN, Xiao-jun WANG, 2020: Seepage-heat transfer coupling process of low temperature return water injected into geothermal reservoir in carbonate rocks in Xian County, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 305-314. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.04.001
[4]	FENG Jian-yun, ZHANG Ying, HE Zhi-liang, SUN Zi-ming, LUO Jun, 2019: Discussion on evaluation methodology of hydrothermal geothermal reservoir, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 29-41. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.01.003
[5]	WANG Shu-fang, LIU Jiu-rong, SUN Ying, LIU Shi-liang, GAO Xiao-rong, SUN Cai-xia, LI Hai-kui, 2018: Study on the geothermal production and reinjection mode in Xiong County, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 178-186. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.03.003
[6]	ZHAO Fang-hua, 2018: Research on single hole heat transfer power of ground source heat pump system, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 65-70. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.01.008
[7]	ZHU Wei, TANG Wen, LIU Qiang, ZHANG Mei-gui, 2017: Analysis on variation characteristics of geothermal response in Liaoning Province, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 336-342.
[8]	LI Guo-ao, YAN Lei, CHEN Zhen-he, LI Ye, 2017: Determination of organic carbon in soils and sediments in an automatic method, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 124-129.
[9]	LIU Yan-guang, LIU Bing, LU Chuan, ZHU Xi, WANG Gui-ling, 2017: Reconstruction of deep fluid chemical constituents for estimation of geothermal reservoir temperature using chemical geothermometers, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 173-181.
[10]	MA Zhi-yuan, XU Yong, ZHAI Mei-jing, WU Min, 2017: Clogging mechanism in the process of reinjection of used geothermal water: A simulation research on Xianyang No.2 reinjection well in a super-deep and porous geothermal reservoir, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 311-325.
[11]	JI Rui-li, ZHANG Ming, SU Rui, GUO Yong-hai, ZHOU Zhi-chao, LI Jie-biao, 2016: Research of in-situ hydraulic test method by using double packer equipment, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 41-51.
[12]	ZHANG Pei-feng, 2016: Thermal stresses analysis of casing string used in enhanced geothermal systems wells, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 293-300.
[13]	FENG Guan-hong, XU Tian-fu, ZHU Hui-xing, 2016: Dynamics of fluid and heat flow in a CO2-based injection-production geothermal system, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 377-388.
[14]	SUN Dong-sheng, ZHAO Wei-hua, LI A-wei, ZHANG An-bin, 2015: Analysis on method for effective in-situ stress measurement in hot dry rock reservoir, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 9-15.
[15]	Wang Bin, LI Bai-xiang, LI Fu-cheng, 2015: Discussion on heat source mechanism and geothermal system of Qinghai Gonghe-Guide Basin, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 86-97.
[16]	LIU Yan-guang, ZHU Xi, YUE Gao-fan, LIN Wen-jing, HE Yu-jiang, WANG Gui-ling, 2015: A review of fluid flow and heat transfer in the CO2-EGS, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 170-175.
[17]	Do Van Binh, 2014: Using Environmental Isotope Method to Study the Air Temperature Variations of the Earth, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 97-102.
[18]	LIU Kai, SUN Ying, LI Yu, LIU Jiu-rong, LIU Ying-chao, 2014: Zonation for exploitation and utilization of geothermal water in Beijing, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 94-104.
[19]	ZHANG Shao-cai, LIU Li-jun, LIU Zhi-gang, WANG Jun-jie, CUI Qiu-ping, WANG Juan, 2014: Method for groundwater research in bedrock of mountainous area of Hebei, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 97-104.
[20]	LIU Chang-Rong, HUANG Shuang-Bing, ZHANG Li-Zhong, 2014: New Mine Geological Environment Impact Assessment Method, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 88-96.