• ISSN 2305-7068
  • Indexed by ESCI CABI CAS
  • DOAJ EBSCO ProQuest Scopus GeoRef AJ CNKI
Advanced Search
Volume 13 Issue 1
Mar.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Ghorbaniaghdam M, Khozeymehnezhad H, bilondi MP, et al. 2025. Application of modified two-point hedging policy in groundwater resources planning in the Kashan Plain Aquifer. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 13(1): 62-73 doi:  10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280039
Citation: Ghorbaniaghdam M, Khozeymehnezhad H, bilondi MP, et al. 2025. Application of modified two-point hedging policy in groundwater resources planning in the Kashan Plain Aquifer. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 13(1): 62-73 doi:  10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280039

Application of modified two-point hedging policy in groundwater resources planning in the Kashan Plain Aquifer

doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280039
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Hkhozeymeh@birjand.ac.ir
  • Received Date: 2023-05-19
  • Accepted Date: 2024-11-25
  • Available Online: 2025-02-20
  • Publish Date: 2025-03-10
  • Effective management of water resources, especially groundwater, is crucial and requires a precise understanding of aquifer characteristics, imposed stresses, and the groundwater balance. Simulation-optimization models plays a vital role in guiding planners toword sustainable long-term aquifer exploitation. This study simulated monthly water table variations in the Kashan Plain over a ten-year period from 2008 to 2019 across 125 stress periods using the GMS model. The model was calibrated for both steady-state and transient conditions for the 2008–2016 period and validated for the 2016–2019 period. Results indicated a 4.4 m decline in groundwater levels over the 10-year study period. Given the plain's location in a arid climatic zone with limited effective precipitation for aquifer recharge, the study focused on groundwater extraction management. A modified two-point hedging policy was employed as a solution to mitigate critical groundwater depletion, reducing the annual drawdown rate from 0.44 m to 0.31 m and conserving 255 million cubic meters (mcm) of water annually. Although this approach slightly decreased reliability (i.e. the number of months meeting full water demands), it effectively minimized the risk of severe droughts and irreparable damages. This policy offers managers a dynamical and intelligent tool for regulating groundwater extraction, balancing aquifer sustainability with agricultural and urban water requirements.
  • 加载中
  • Ahlfeld DP, Barlow PM, Mulligan AE. 2005. GWM-A ground-water management process for the US Geological Survey modular ground-water model (MODFLOW-2000): 124. Washington DC, USA: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. ‏
    Babel MS, Gupta AD, Nayak DK. 2005. A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resources Management, 19: 693–712. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-005-3282-4.
    Bhatia N, Srivastav R, Srinivasan K. 2018. Season-Dependent hedging policies for reservoir operation—A comparison study. Water, 10(10): 1311. DOI: 10.3390/w10101311.
    Ketabchi H, Ataie-Ashtiani B. 2015a. Review: Coastal groundwater optimization advances, challenges, and practical solutions. Journal of Hydrology, 23: 1129−1154. DOI: 10.1007/s10040-015-1254-1.
    Ketabchi H, Ataie-Ashtiani B. 2015b. Evolutionary algorithms for the optimal management of coastal groundwater: A comparative study toward future challenges. Journal of Hydrology, 520: 193−213. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.043.
    Liu Y, Zhao J, Zheng H. 2018. Piecewise-linear hedging rules for reservoir operation with economic and ecologic objectives. Water, 10(7): 865. ‏ DOI: 10.3390/w10070865.
    Men B, Wu Z, Liu H, et al. 2019. Research on hedging rules based on water supply priority and benefit loss of water shortage—A case study of Tianjin, China. Water, 11(4): 778. ‏ DOI: 10.3390/w11040778.
    Neelakantan TR, Pundarikanthan NV. 2000. Neural network-based simulation-optimization model for reservoir operation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 126(2): 57–64. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2000)126:2(57).
    Nguyen AT, Reiter S, Rigo P. 2014. A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy, 113: 1043−1058. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.061.
    Sadeghi-Tabas S, Samadi SZ, Akbarpour A, et al. 2017. Sustainable groundwater modeling using single and multi objective optimization algorithms. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 19(1): 97–114. DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2016.006.
    Saghi-Jadid M, Ketabchi H. 2020. Result-based management approach for aquifer restoration problems using a combined numerical simulation–parallel evolutionary optimization model. Journal of Hydrology:125709. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125709.
    Shiau JT. 2011. Analytical optimal hedging with explicit incorporation of reservoir release and carryover storage targets. Water Resources Research, 47(1). DOI: 10.1029/2010WR009166.
    Shourian M, Jamshidi J. 2022. Hedging rule-based optimized reservoir operation using metaheuristic algorithms. In E3S Web of Conferences, 346: 02011. EDP Sciences. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202234602011.
    Spiliotis M, Mediero L, Garrote L. 2016. Optimization of hedging rules for reservoir operation during droughts based on particle swarm optimization. Water Resources Management, 30: 5759–5778. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-016-1285-y.
    Srinivasan K, Kranthi K. 2018. Multi-Objective Simulation-Optimization model for long-term reservoir operation using piecewise linear hedging rule. Water Resource Management, 32: 1901−1911. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-018-1911-y.
    UNESCO. 2007. Groundwater Resources Sustainability Indicators.
    Vander Bruggen B, Milis R, Vandecasteele C, et al. 2003. Electrodialysis and nanofiltration of surface water for subsequent use as infiltration water. Water Research, 37(16): 3867−3874. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00296-3.
    Yang L, Cheng YP, Wen X-R, et al. 2024. Development, hotspots and trend directions of groundwater numerical simulation: A bibliometric and visualization analysis. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12(4): 411−427. DOI: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280031.
    Wang H, Liu J. 2013. Reservoir operation incorporating hedging rules and operational inflow forecasts. Water Resources Management, 27: 1427–1438. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-012-0246-3.
    Xu B, Zhong PA, Huang Q, et al. 2017. Optimal hedging rules for water supply reservoir operations under forecast uncertainty and conditional value-at-risk criterion. Water, 9(8): 568. DOI: 10.3390/w9080568.
  • 2305-7068/© Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)

  • Relative Articles

    [1] Liu Yang, Yan-pei Cheng, Xue-ru Wen, Jun Liu, 2024: Development, hotspots and trend directions of groundwater numerical simulation: A bibliometric and visualization analysis, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12, 411-427.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280031
    [2] Jwan Sabah Mustafa, Dana Khider Mawlood, 2024: Developing three-dimensional groundwater flow modeling for the Erbil Basin using Groundwater Modeling System (GMS), Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12, 178-189.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280014
    [3] Yi-hang Gao, Jun-hui Shen, Lin Chen, Xiao Li, Shuang Jin, Zhen Ma, Qing-hua Meng, 2023: Influence of underground space development mode on the groundwater flow field in Xiong’an new area, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 68-80.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280007
    [4] Wondmagegn Taye Abebe, 2022: Evaluation of groundwater resource potential by using water balance model: A case of Upper Gilgel Gibe Watershed, Ethiopia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 209-222.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.03.001
    [5] Yu-kun Sun, Feng Liu, Hua-jun Wang, Xin-zhi Gao, 2022: Numerical simulation of operation performance on production and injection of a double well geothermal system in Kailu Basin, Inner Mongolia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 196-208.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.02.008
    [6] Hao ZHOU, Yong WU, Feng HUANG, Xue-fang TANG, 2021: Experimental simulation and dynamic model analysis of Cadmium (Cd) release in soil affected by rainfall leaching in a coal-mining area, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 65-72.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.01.006
    [7] Muhammad Juandi, 2020: Water sustainability model for estimation of groundwater availability in Kemuning district, Riau-Indonesia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 20-29.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.01.003
    [8] ZHU Heng-hua, JIA Chao, XU Yu-liang, YU Ze-min, YU Wei-jiang, 2018: Study on numerical simulation of organic pollutant transport in groundwater northwest of Laixi, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 293-305.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.04.005
    [9] LI Lu-lu, SU Chen, HAO Qi-chen, SHAO Jing-li, 2018: Numerical simulation of response of groundwater flow system in inland basin to density changes, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 7-17.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.01.002
    [10] GUO Chun-yan, CUI Ya-li, LIU Wen-na, CUI Xiang-xiang, FEI Yu-hong, 2018: Research on numerical simulation of the groundwater funnels restoration in Shijiazhuang, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 126-135.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.02.006
    [11] Eunhee Lee, Kyoochul Ha, Nguyen Thi Minh Ngoc, Adichat Surinkum, Ramasamy Jayakumar, Yongje Kim, Kamaludin Bin Hassan, 2017: Groundwater status and associated issues in the Mekong-Lancang River Basin: International collaborations to achieve sustainable groundwater resources, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 1-13.
    [12] CHENG Tang-pei, LIU Xing-wei, SHAO Jing-Li, CUI Ya-li, 2016: Review of the algebraic linear methods and parallel implementation in numerical simulation of groundwater flow, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 12-17.
    [13] MA Luan, WANG Guang-cai, SHI Zhe-ming, GUO Yu-ying, XU Qing-yu, HUANG Xu-juan, 2016: Simulation of groundwater level recovery in abandoned mines, Fengfeng coalfield, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 344-353.
    [14] XIA Ri-yuan, 2016: Groundwater resources in karst area in Southern China and sustainable utilization pattern, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 301-309.
    [15] WEI Jia-hua, CHU Hai-bo, WANG Rong, JIANG Yuan, 2015: Numerical simulation of karst groundwater system for discharge prediction and protection design of spring in Fangshan District, Beijing, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 316-330.
    [16] GAO Zong-jun, ZHU Zhen-hui, LIU Xiao-di, XU Yan-lan, 2014: The Formation and Model of High Fluoride Groundwater and In-situ Dispelling Fluoride Assumption in Gaomi City of Shandong Province, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 34-39.
    [17] Le SONG, Yan-pei CHENG, 2014: Optimization Research of Water-Soil Resources in Huanghua, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 86-94.
    [18] CHEN Qu, 2014: Anticipatory Adaptation Approaches to Climate Change--A Review and Discussion of Southern Australia’s Sustainable Water Management and Its Strategies and Shortcomings, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 54-61.
    [19] LI Yu, CUI Yu, SUN Ying, LI Zhi-ping, WANG Xin-juan, WANG Li-ya, YANG Qing, WANG Rong, 2014: Sustainable utilization measures of groundwater resources in Beijing, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 60-66.
    [20] Jiankang Zhang, Yanpei Cheng, Hua Dong, Qingshi Guo, Kun Liu, Fawang Zhang, 2013: Study on Ecological Environment and Sustainable Land Use Based on Satellite Remote Sensing, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 89-96.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(9)  / Tables(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (16) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    JGSE-ScholarOne Manuscript Launched on June 1, 2024.

    Online Submission

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return