Research of in-situ hydraulic test method by using double packer equipment

JI Rui-li; ZHANG Ming; SU Rui; GUO Yong-hai; ZHOU Zhi-chao; LI Jie-biao

Volume 4 Issue 1

Mar. 2016

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering > 2016 > 4(1): 41-51

JI Rui-li, ZHANG Ming, SU Rui, et al. 2016: Research of in-situ hydraulic test method by using double packer equipment. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4(1): 41-51.

Citation:

JI Rui-li, ZHANG Ming, SU Rui, et al. 2016: Research of in-situ hydraulic test method by using double packer equipment. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4(1): 41-51.

JI Rui-li, ZHANG Ming, SU Rui, et al. 2016: Research of in-situ hydraulic test method by using double packer equipment. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4(1): 41-51.

Citation:

JI Rui-li, ZHANG Ming, SU Rui, et al. 2016: Research of in-situ hydraulic test method by using double packer equipment. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4(1): 41-51.

PDF( 2452 KB)

Research of in-situ hydraulic test method by using double packer equipment

1Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, CNNC Key Laboratory on Geological Disposal of High-level Radioactive Waste, Beijing 100029, China.

Publish Date: 2016-03-28

Abstract

Abstract

Double packer equipment for hydraulic test can be used to measure pressure of test zone directly, and it is frequently used to perform many kinds of hydraulic tests and take groundwater sample from borehole. The test method of this equipment mainly includes the test design, implementation, interpretation and synthetic analysis. By adopting the double packer equipment for hydraulic test, the parameter distribution of rock permeability along borehole can be acquired, as well as the connectivity, water conductivity and water bearing capacity of the disclosed structure and the chemical characteristics of the deep groundwater. It is a necessary method for the research and evaluation of the complex hypotonicity terrace site selection under geological conditions. This method is not only suitable for the geological disposal of high level radioactive waste, but also can be used in the site selection of underground facilities such as storage of petroleum and carbon dioxide. Meanwhile, it has a good application prospect in other hydrogeological investigation fields.
- Lower permeability rock,
- Double packer equipment,
- Borehole,
- In-situ test method

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

Cristian Enachescu, Stephan Rohs, Philopp Wolf. 2007. Hydraulic injection tests in borehole KLX08. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.

WANG Ju, SU Rui, et al. 2006. Deep geological disposal of high-level radioactive wastes in China. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 25(4): 649-658.

YUAN Guo-hong, MA Lin. 2009. Development and application of auto hydrogeological parameters monitoring and data processing system. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 28(4): 834-839.

Hamm Se-Yeong, Kim MoonSu, et al. 2007. Relationship between hydraulic conductivity and fracture properties estimated from packer tests and borehole data in a fractured granite. Engineering Geology, 92(1): 73-87.

ASTM International. 2008. ASTM D4631-95 (2008), standard Test method for determining transmissivity and storativity of low permeability rocks by in situ measurements using pressure pulse technique. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.

WANG Hai-zhong. 2005. Research and application of the hydraulic double plugsealing water injection test technique. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 32(5): 116-120.

PANG Zhong-he, GUO Yong-hai, et al. 2007. Experimental study on cycle property of groundwater in fractured granite in Beishan, China. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 26 (S2): 3954-3958.

ZHANG Ming, JI Rui-li, et al. 2014. Comparison of CHI test data interpretation method in Xinchang block. World Nuclear Geoscience, 31(1): 32-38.

JI Rui-li, ZHANG Ming, et al. 2014. Borehole injection tests and character of fracture permeability in Yamansu block.World nuclear geoscience, 31(S1): 217-222.

Johan Harrstr?m, Tomas Svensson, Jan-Erik Ludvigson. 2007. Forsmark site investigation Single-hole hydraulic tests in borehole KFM11A. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.

National Nuclear Safety Administration. 2013. HAD 401/06-201, Site selection of high-level radioactive waste geological disposal. Beijing: National Nuclear Safety Administration.

Mejías Miguel, Renard Philippe, Glenz Damian. 2009. Hydraulic testing of low-permeability formations: A case study in the granite of Cadalso de los Vidrios, Spain. Engineering Geology, 107(3): 88-97.

Svensk k?rnbr?nslehantering AB. 2001. Site investigations: investigation methods and general execution programme. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.

SU Rui, WANG Ju, et al. 2007a. An overview of test technique and theory study of slug test. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 26 (S2): 3882-3890.

ASTM International. 2008. ASTM D 4630-96 (Reapproved 2008), standard test method for determining transmissivity and storage coefficient of low-permeability rocks by in situ measurements using the constant head injection test. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.

SU Rui, ZONG Zi-hua, et al. 2007b. Application of integrated borehole measurement techniques to hydrogeological characteristics evaluation of water-conductive fault. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 26 (S2): 3866-3873.

Butler Jr J J. 1997. The design, performance, and analysis of slug test. New York: Lewis Publishers.

WANG Ju, GUO Yong-hai, et al. 2008. Study on site characterization methodologies for high level radioactive waste disposal. Dunhuang: Chinese Society for Rock Mechanics and Engineering.

Adams J. 1994. Application of borehole double-packer in determining stress and hydrogeoogical properties. Express Water Resources & Hydropower Information, 19: 17-22.

National Development and Reform Commission. 2005. Code of water pressure test in borehole for hydropower and water resources engineering (DL/T 5331-2005). Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission.

Ludvigson Jan-Erik, Hansson Kent, Hjerne Calle. 2007. Method evaluation of single-hole hydraulic injection tests at site investigations in Forsmark. ?sthammar: Svensk k?rnbr?nslehantering (SKB) .

Relative Articles

[1]	Muthamilselvan A Dr, Sekar Anamika, Ignatius Emmanuel, 2022: Identification of groundwater potential in hard rock aquifer systems using Remote Sensing, GIS and Magnetic Survey in Veppanthattai, Perambalur, Tamilnadu, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 367-380. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.04.005
[2]	Yu-kun Sun, Feng Liu, Hua-jun Wang, Xin-zhi Gao, 2022: Numerical simulation of operation performance on production and injection of a double well geothermal system in Kailu Basin, Inner Mongolia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 196-208. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.02.008
[3]	Rustadi, I Gede Boy Darmawan, Nandi Haerudin, Agus Setiawan, Suharno, 2022: Groundwater exploration using integrated geophysics method in hard rock terrains in Mount Betung Western Bandar Lampung, Indonesia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 10-18. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.01.002
[4]	Lin-song Yu, Hong-bo Liu, Fang Wan, Zun-fang Hu, Huai-dong Luo, Xiu-wen Zhang, 2021: Geochemical records of the sediments and their significance in Dongping Lake Area, the lower reach of Yellow River , North China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 140-151. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.02.006
[5]	Hong-bo HAO, Jie LV, Yan-mei CHEN, Chuan-zi WANG, Xiao-rui HUANG, 2021: Research advances in non-Darcy flow in low permeability media, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 83-92. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.01.008
[6]	Wen-kai KANG, Feng LIU, Fei-fan YANG, Hua-jun WANG, 2020: Simulation of heat transfer performance using middle-deep coaxial borehole heat exchangers by FEFLOW, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 315-327. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.04.002
[7]	SOSI Benjamin, BARONGO Justus, GETABU Albert, MAOBE Samson, 2019: Electrical-hydraulic conductivity model for a weathered-fractured aquifer system of Olbanita, Lower Baringo Basin, Kenya Rift, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 360-372. doi: DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.04.007
[8]	NAN Tian, GUO Si-jia, 2019: Influence of borehole quantity and distribution on lithology field simulation, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 295-308. doi: DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.04.001
[9]	ZHANG De-long, WENG Wei, ZHAO Chang-liang, XU Jun-jun, YANG Peng, HUANG Yu-wen, HU Zhen-zhong, 2018: Development and application of turbodrills in hot dry rock drilling, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 1-6. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.01.001
[10]	WANG Ji-ning, MENG Yong-hui, 2016: Characteristics analysis and model prediction of sea-salt water intrusion in lower reaches of the Weihe River, Shandong Province, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 149-156.
[11]	ZHANG Sheng, ZHANG Cui-yun, HE Ze, CHEN Li, ZHANG Fa-wang, YIN Mi-ying, NING Zhuo, SUN Zhen-hua, ZHEN Shi-jun, 2016: Application research of enhanced in-situ micro-ecological remediation of petroleum contaminated soil, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 157-164.
[12]	ZHU Xi, ZHANG Qing-lian, WANG Wan-li, LIU Yan-guang, 2015: Study on the influencing factors of rock-soil thermophysical parameters in shallow geothermal energy, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 256-267.
[13]	LIU Jin-hui, SUN Zhan-xue, SHI Wei-jun, ZHOU Yi-peng, 2015: Factors influencing in-situ leaching of uranium mining in a sandstone deposit in Shihongtan, Northwest China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 16-20.
[14]	SUN Dong-sheng, ZHAO Wei-hua, LI A-wei, ZHANG An-bin, 2015: Analysis on method for effective in-situ stress measurement in hot dry rock reservoir, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 9-15.
[15]	SHI Jian-sheng, LIU Chang-li, DONG Hua, YAN Zhen-peng, WANG Yan-jun, LIU Xin-hao, GUO Xiu-yan, JIAO Hong-jun, YIN Mi-ying, HOU Huai-ren, 2014: Stability assessment and risk analysis of aboveground river in lower Yellow River, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 1-18.
[16]	LU Chuan, LI Long, LIU Yan-guang, WANG Gui-ling, 2014: Capillary Pressure and Relative Permeability Model Uncertainties in Simulations of Geological CO2 Sequestration, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 1-17.
[17]	Jian-ye GUI, Chen-ling ZHANG, Yong-tao ZHANG, Li ZHANG, 2014: Rapid Determination of Polar Herbicides in Soil Samples Using Accelerated Ultrasonic Extraction (AUE) in Combination with Dispersion and In-situ Derivatization, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 56-62.
[18]	GAO Zong-jun, ZHU Zhen-hui, LIU Xiao-di, XU Yan-lan, 2014: The Formation and Model of High Fluoride Groundwater and In-situ Dispelling Fluoride Assumption in Gaomi City of Shandong Province, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 34-39.
[19]	, 2013: The Study of Statistical Damage Constitutive Models of Rock and Its Parameters Based on Lade-Duncan Criterion, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 74-79.
[20]	Jingli Shao, Yali Cui, Yunzhang Zhao, 2013: A Study on Infiltration and Groundwater Development in the Influent Zone of the Perched Lower Yellow River, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 46-53.