Comparison between Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) application for analysing pumping test data of unconfined aquifer

Dana Mawlood; Jwan Mustafa

Volume 4 Issue 3

Sep. 2016

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering > 2016 > 4(3): 165-173

Dana Mawlood, Jwan Mustafa. 2016: Comparison between Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) application for analysing pumping test data of unconfined aquifer. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4(3): 165-173.

Citation:

PDF( 2027 KB)

Comparison between Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) application for analysing pumping test data of unconfined aquifer

Dana Mawlood^,,
Jwan Mustafa

1Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Salahaddin, Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. 2 General Directorate of Dams and Reservoirs, Ministry of Agricultural and Water Resources, Erbil, Kurdistan region of Iraq.

Publish Date: 2016-09-28

Abstract

Abstract

Pumping test of a water table aquifer is carried out to estimate the aquifer parameters, the obtained data were analysed through the solution of both Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) methods through AQTESOLV and Spreadsheet programs, the results of each methods are compared to evaluate the applicability and accuracy of the solution theoretically and practically. In the paper an example is presented, which is conducted for a constant rate pumping test from Ohio, in Fairborn (near Dayton), and it supplied by S.E. Norris (U.S. Geological Survey, Columbus, Ohio). The main objective of this study is to introduce both program and the way of the applications, and compare the results and the hand on of both programs in the field.
- Neuman (1975),
- Unconfined aquifer,
- Pumping test,
- AQTESOLV program,
- Microsoft Excel (Spreadsheet) program

FullText(HTML)

References(42)

References

Neuman S P. 1975. Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research, 11(2): 329–342.

Neuman S P. 1973. Supplementary comments on “Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response of the water table”. Water Resources Research, 9(4): 1102–1103.

Boulton N S. 1954. The drawdown of the water-table under non-steady conditions near a pumped well in an unconfined formation. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 3(4): 564–579.

Mishra P K, Neuman S P. 2010. Improved forward and inverse analyses of saturated-unsaturated flow toward a well in a compressible unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research, 46(7) .

Neuman S P. 1987. On methods of determining specific yield. Ground Water, 25(6): 679–684.

Zhan H, Zlotnik V A. 2002. Groundwater flow to a horizontal or slanted well in an unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research, 38(7) .

Tartakovsky G D, Neuman S P. 2007. Three- dimensional saturated-unsaturated flow with axial symmetry to a partially penetrating well in a compressible unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research, 43(1) .

Mishra P K, Neuman S P. 2011. Saturated- unsaturated flow to a well with storage in a compressible unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research, 47(5) .

Moench A F, Prickett T A. 1972. Radial flow in an infinite aquifer undergoing conversion from artesian to water table conditions. Water Resources Research, 8(2): 494–499.

Cooper H H, Jacob C E. 1946. A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 27(4): 526–534.

Streltsova T D. 1972a. Unconfined aquifer and slow drainage. Journal of Hydrology, 16(2): 117–124.

Neuman S P. 1974. Effect of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research, 10(2): 303–312.

Neuman S P. 1979. Perspective on “delayed yield”. Water resources research, 15(4): 899-908.

Moench A F. 1997. Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer. Water Resources Research, 33(6): 1397–1407.

Malama B. 2011. Alternative linearization of water table kinematic condition for unconfined aquifer pumping test modeling and its implications for specific yield estimates. Journal of Hydrology, 399(3): 141–147.

Boulton N S. 1970. Analysis of data from pumping tests in unconfined anisotropic aquifers. Journal of Hydrology, 10(4): 369–378.

Nwankwor G I, Cherry J A, Gillham R W. 1984. A comparative study of specific yield determinations for a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water, 22(6): 764–772.

Moench A F. 1995. Combining the Neuman and Boulton models for flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer. Ground Water, 33(3): 378–384.

Zlotnik V, Ledder G. 1992. Groundwater flow in a compressible unconfined aquifer with uniform circular recharge. Water Resources Research, 28(6): 1619–1630.

Nwankwor G I, Gillham R W, et al. 1992. Unsaturated and saturated flow in response to pumping of an unconfined aquifer: Field evidence of delayed drainage. Ground Water, 30(5): 690–700.

Moench A F. 1993. Computation of type curves for flow to partially penetrating wells in water-table aquifers. Ground Water, 31(6): 966–971.

Neuman S P. 1972. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response of the water table. Water Resources Research, 8(4):1031–1045.

Moench A F. 1998. Correction to “Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer”. Water Resources Research, 34(9): 2431–2432.

Theis C V. 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 16(2): 519– 524.

Moench A F, Garabedian S P, LeBlanc D R. 2001. Estimation of hydraulic parameters from an unconfined aquifer test conducted in a glacial outwash deposit, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Massachusetts: US Geological Survey.

Narasimhan T N, ZHU M. 1993. Transient flow of water to a well in an unconfined aquifer: Applicability of some conceptual models. Water Resources Research, 29(1): 179–191.

Boulton N S. 1963. Analysis of data from non-equilibrium pumping tests allowing for delayed yield from storage. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 26(3): 469–482.

CHEN Xun-hong, Goeke J, Summerside S. 1999. Hydraulic properties and uncertainly analysis for an unconfined alluvial aquifer, 37(6): 845–854.

Boulton N S. 1955. Unsteady radial flow to a pumped well allowing for delayed yield from storage. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication, 37: 472–477.

Streltsova T D. 1973. Flow near a pumped well in an unconfined aquifer under nonsteady conditions. Water Resources Research, 9(1): 227–235.

Prickett T A. 1965. Type-curve solution to aquifer tests under water-table conditions. Ground Water, 3(3): 5–14.

Hantush M S. 1960. Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers. Journal of Geophysical Research, 65(11): 3713–3725.

Moench A F. 2004. Importance of the vadose zone in analyses of unconfined aquifer tests. Ground Water, 42(2): 223.

Streltsova T D. 1974. Drawdown in compressible unconfined aquifer. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 100(11): 1601–1616.

Moench A F. 1996. Flow to a well in a water-table aquifer: An improved laplace transform solution. Ground Water, 34(4): 593–596.

Streltsova T D. 1972b. Unsteady radial flow in an unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research, 8(4): 1059–1066.

Zlotnik V, Ledder G. 1992. Groundwater flow in a compressible unconfined aquifer with uniform circular recharge. Water Resources Research, 28(6): 1619–1630.

Krásny J. 1993. Classification of transmissivity magnitude and variation. Ground Water, 31(2): 230–236.

Zhan H, Zlotnik V A. 2002. Groundwater flow to a horizontal or slanted well in an unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research, 38(7) .

Ni C F, Huang Y J, et al. Sequential hydraulic tests for transient and highly permeable unconfined aquifer systems–model development and field-scale implementation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 12: 12567–12613.

Fetter C W. 2001. Applied hydrogeology (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 598.

Relative Articles

[1]	ILUNGA Nyembwe, AMADI Akobundu Nwanosike, Gilbert NDATIMANA, Nelson OKOT, Raphaël TSHIMANGA Muamba, 2024: Evaluation of aquifer hydraulic properties from resistivity and pumping test data in parts of Gwagwalada, Northcentral Nigeria, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12, 309-320. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280023
[2]	Peng-yu Shi, Jian-jun Liu, Yi-jie Zong, Kai-qing Teng, Yu-ming Huang, Liang Xiao, 2023: Analytical solution for Non-Darcian effect on transient confined-unconfined flow in a confined aquifer, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 365-378. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280029
[3]	Muthamilselvan A Dr, Sekar Anamika, Ignatius Emmanuel, 2022: Identification of groundwater potential in hard rock aquifer systems using Remote Sensing, GIS and Magnetic Survey in Veppanthattai, Perambalur, Tamilnadu, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 367-380. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.04.005
[4]	Laouni Benadela, Belkacem Bekkoussa, Laouni Gaidi, 2022: Multivariate analysis and geochemical investigations of groundwater in a semi-arid region, case of superficial aquifer in Ghriss Basin, Northwest Algeria, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 233-249. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.03.003
[5]	Jin-xing Guo, Zhi-ping Li, Catalin Stefan, 2022: Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) applications in China–achievements and challenges, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 57-69. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.01.006
[6]	Yi-jie Zong, Li-hua Chen, Jian-jun Liu, Yue-hui Liu, Yong-xin Xu, Fu-wan Gan, Liang Xiao, 2022: Analytical solutions for constant-rate test in bounded confined aquifers with non-Darcian effect, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 311-321. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.04.001
[7]	Marios C Kirlas, 2021: Assessment of porous aquifer hydrogeological parameters using automated groundwater level measurements in Greece, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 269-278. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.04.001
[8]	Chun-lei GUI, Zhen-xing WANG, Rong MA, Xue-feng ZUO, 2021: Aquifer hydraulic conductivity prediction via coupling model of MCMC-ANN, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 1-11. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.01.001
[9]	Qiao-ling YUAN, Zhi-ping LI, Lei-cheng LI, Shu-li WANG, Si-yu YAO, 2020: Pharmaceuticals and personal care products transference-transformation in aquifer system, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 358-365. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.04.006
[10]	Mehmood Qaisar, Arshad Muhammad, Rizwan Muhammad, Hamid Shanawar, Mehmood Waqas, Ansir Muneer Muhammad, Irfan Muhammad, Anjum Lubna, 2020: Integration of geoelectric and hydrochemical approaches for delineation of groundwater potential zones in alluvial aquifer, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 366-380. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.04.007
[11]	Yacob T Tesfaldet, Avirut Puttiwongrak, Tanwa Arpornthip, 2020: Spatial and temporal variation of groundwater recharge in shallow aquifer in the Thepkasattri of Phuket, Thailand, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 10-19. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.01.002
[12]	A S El-Hames, 2020: Development of a simple method for determining the influence radius of a pumping well in steady-state condition, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 97-107. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.02.001
[13]	Muhammad Nauman Malik, Mehdi Murtuza, Iqbal Asif, Bakar Muhammad Saifullah Abu, Brahim Aissa, Dk Nur Afiqah Jalwati Puteri, Amer Farhan Rafique, 2019: Adaptive state estimation of groundwater contaminant boundary input flux in a 2-dimensional aquifer, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 373-382. doi: DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.04.008
[14]	HAO Qi-chen, SHAO Jing-li, CUI Ya-li, ZHANG Qiu-lan, 2016: Development of a new method for efficiently calculating of evaporation from the phreatic aquifer in variably saturated flow modeling, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 26-34.
[15]	ZHANG Xiang-yang, CHEN Zong-yu, YANG Guo-min, TU Le-yi, HU Shui-ming, 2016: Krypton-85 dating of shallow aquifer in Hebei Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 328-332.
[16]	NAN Tian, SHAO Jing-li, CUI Ya-li, 2016: Column test-based features analysis of clogging in artificial recharge of groundwater in Beijing, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 88-95.
[17]	JI Rui-li, ZHANG Ming, SU Rui, GUO Yong-hai, ZHOU Zhi-chao, LI Jie-biao, 2016: Research of in-situ hydraulic test method by using double packer equipment, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 41-51.
[18]	GONG Xiao-ping, JIANG Guang-hui, CHEN Chang-jie, GUO Xiao-jiao, ZHANG Hua-sheng, 2015: Specific yield of phreatic variation zone in karst aquifer with the method of water level analysis, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 192-201.
[19]	, 2014: The Experimental Investigations on Motion Features of Groundwater Flow near the Pumping Well, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 1-11.
[20]	Patsakron Assiri, 2013: Artesian Flowing Wells Field of Phu Tok Aquifer, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 95-98.