Basic environmental conditions of groundwater at a typical golf course

XIA Fan; SONG Hong-wei; XU Tie-bing; SU Ya-nan; TIAN Xi-zhao

doi:10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.02.007

Volume 6 Issue 2

Jun. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering > 2018 > 6(2): 136-149

XIA Fan, SONG Hong-wei, XU Tie-bing, et al. 2018: Basic environmental conditions of groundwater at a typical golf course. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6(2): 136-149. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.02.007

Citation:

XIA Fan, SONG Hong-wei, XU Tie-bing, et al. 2018: Basic environmental conditions of groundwater at a typical golf course. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6(2): 136-149. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.02.007

Citation:

PDF( 953 KB)

Basic environmental conditions of groundwater at a typical golf course

doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.02.007

1Hebei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050031, China.2 Institute of Hydrogeological and Environmental Geology, CAGS, Shijiazhuang 050061, China.3Hebei Provincial Institute of Geological Environmental Monitoring, Shijiazhuang 050021, China.

Publish Date: 2018-06-28

Abstract

Abstract

Taking a golf course as the object of investigation, this paper monitors the groundwater distribution of the course, uses the assessment method of groundwater quality and pollution status to evaluate the groundwater foundation of the course. The results show that shallow groundwater and deep groundwater are polluted to different degrees, and the pollution of shallow groundwater is very serious. In terms of distribution space, the monitoring well in the downstream direction of golf course is the most seriously polluted.

FullText(HTML)

References(9)

References

CONG Lin, CONG Lin, JIN Xiao-xia. 2015. Groundwater quality analysis and pollution assessment of golf course. Environmental Study and Monitoring, 9(3): 71-76.

General Technical Team. 2015b. Training materials of investigation and assessment of basic ground?water environment condition in and around golf course. Beijing: General Technical Team.

PUYANG Xue-hua. 2016. Eco-environmental health assessment research of golf course. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University.

JIA Liang-qing, OUYANG Zhi-yun, et al. 2003. Effects of golf building on ecosystem and environmental management measures. Urban Environment & Urban Biology, 16(4):43-45.

LAI Su-yu. 2007. Eco-environmental effects and countermeasures of golf courses. Fujian Agri-cultural Science and Technology, (03):73-74.

General Technical Team. 2015a. Implementation plan for assessment of the national groundwater basic environmental investigation. Beijing: General Technical Team.

CHANG Zhi-hui, Han Lie-bao. 2002. Research progress on environmental effects of application of pesticide fertilizer on golf course. Grassland and Turf (Quarterly), 4(99):6-9.

MA Zhi-chao, JIN Ke-lin, et al. 2010. Research on reclaimed water irrigation in golf course of China. Water Saving Irrigation, (2):30-33.

WU Xiao-xia, XU Tian-wei. 2017. Research on the ecological environment of golf course. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, (1):17-20.

Relative Articles

[1]	Min Wang, 2024: Accelerating collaborative innovation in hydrological, engineering, and environmental fields, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12, 1-3. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280001
[2]	Chu Yu, Li-jie Wu, Yi-long Zhang, Xiu-ya Wang, Zhan-chuan Wang, Zhou Zhang, 2022: Effect of groundwater on the ecological water environment of typical inland lakes in the Inner Mongolian Plateau, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 353-366. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.04.004
[3]	Yue-nan Li, Yan-sheng Gu, Man-zhou Li, Guang-jie Huo, Xi-ping Wang, Zhi-jie Xu, Jie Yue, Dan Du, Man-ge Geng, 2021: Comparison on the phytoextraction efficiency of Bidens pilosa at heavy metal contaminated site in natural and electrokinetic conditions, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 121-128. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.02.004
[4]	Chun-chao ZHANG, Xin-wei HOU, Xiang-quan LI, Zhen-xing WANG, Chun-lei GUI, Xue-feng ZUO, Jian-fei MA, Ming GAO, 2020: Numerical simulation and environmental impact prediction of karst groundwater in Sangu Spring Basin, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 210-222. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.03.002
[5]	LI Jun-ya, WANG Yu-jue, HE Xue-wen, XUE Guo-dong, XU Huan, TIAN Yan-hong, ZHAO Li-li, CUI Qi-hang, 2019: Geothermal resources formation conditions and preferred target areas in a certain county of Western Sichuan,China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 61-69. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.01.006
[6]	ZENG Tu-rong, 2019: Research on basic characteristics of 2H, 18O and 14C in geothermal fluid in Guangdong Province, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 42-52. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.01.004
[7]	SUN Dong, LIU Xin-ze, YANG Hai-jun, CAO Nan, ZHANG Zhi-peng, CHEN Yin-song, LI Da-meng, 2019: Analysis of hydrogeolgical characteristics and water environmental impact pathway of typical shale gas exploration and development zones in Sichuan Basin, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 195-213. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.03.001
[8]	SONG Ang, LIANG Yue-ming, LI Qiang, 2018: Influence of precipitation on bacterial structure in a typical karst spring, SW China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 193-204. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.03.005
[9]	CHEN Peng, CHEN Kang, GAO Ye-xin, 2018: Analysis of phreatic evaporation law and influence factors of typical lithology in Hebei Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 270-279. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.04.003
[10]	WANG Kui-feng, XU Meng, CHEN Xiao-man, 2017: The comprehensive evaluation on resource environmental bearing capacity of central cities in the Yellow River Delta-A case study on Dongying City, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 354-363.
[11]	Ramasamy Jayakumar, Eunhee Lee, 2017: Climate change and groundwater conditions in the Mekong Region–A review, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 14-30.
[12]	ZHANG Wei, SHI Jian-sheng, XU Jian-ming, LIU Ji-chao, DONG Qiu-yao, FAN Shu-xian, 2016: Dynamic influence of Holocene characteristics on vadose water in typical region of central North China Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 247-258.
[13]	WANG Shi-qin, SONG Xian-fang, WEI Shou-cai, SHAO Jing-li, 2016: Application of HYDRUS-1D in understanding soil water movement at two typical sites in the North China Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 1-11.
[14]	BAI Yu-chun, LI Yong-li, DONG Xue-liang, ZHAO Lei, 2014: Analysis and prevention measures for typical geological disasters formation and mechanisms within permafrost zone of Greater Khingan Range, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 85-93.
[15]	Do Van Binh, 2014: Using Environmental Isotope Method to Study the Air Temperature Variations of the Earth, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 97-102.
[16]	Xiu-yan WANG, Yu-hong FEI, 2014: Environmental Effect Caused by Over-exploitation of Deep Groundwater in North China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 12-20.
[17]	MA Shao-bing, ZHOU Jun, LIANG Peng, SU Yao-ming, 2014: Characteristics-based classification research on typical petroleum contaminants of groundwater, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 41-47.
[18]	Changli Liu, Yun Zhang, Chao Song, Hongbing Hou, 2013: Effect of Farmyard Manure Application on Dissolution of Carbonate Rocks and Its Eco-environmental Impact, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 60-69.
[19]	Feng-long Zhang, Fu-li Qi, Shou-cheng Lu, Yong-li Li, 2013: Analysis of the Water Factor with the Major Environmental Issues in the Sanjiang Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 28-32.
[20]	, 2013: Analysis of Groundwater Environmental Conditions and Influencing Factors in Typical City in Northwest China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 60-73.