• ISSN 2305-7068
  • Indexed by ESCI CABI CAS
  • DOAJ EBSCO Scopus GeoRef AJ CNKI
Advanced Search
Volume 1 Issue 3
Dec.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Patsakron Assiri. 2013: Artesian Flowing Wells Field of Phu Tok Aquifer. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1(3): 95-98.
Citation: Patsakron Assiri. 2013: Artesian Flowing Wells Field of Phu Tok Aquifer. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1(3): 95-98.

Artesian Flowing Wells Field of Phu Tok Aquifer

  • Publish Date: 2014-12-28
  • Phu tok Aquifer is the most productive water bearing rock in the Northeastern region of Thailand. Generally, well drilled in this aquifer yields approximately 20–50 m3/hr with some wells yield over 150 m3/hr. This aquifer characterized both unconfined and confined aquifer. Data collected from core sampling and TV bore hole show water bearing fractures in the fine grained massive sandstone intercalated with thin shale layers. These intermittently bedding plane fracture zones were found vertically at 60-65 and 95-110 m below ground surface. Three directions of vertically fractures were also found at 103-104 m in the test well with underlain densely sandstone until 120 m of depth. Wells drilled to 60-70 m fractures at the area where surface elevation between 150 and 170 m above mean sea level were artesian well with rising water about 1-3 m. Natural discharge rate from 2-5 inches of diameter casing is 5-10 m3/hr. Fractures at 90-110 m yield 150 m3/hr through 6 inch casing well with 5-6 m of risen water above the ground. It is found from pumping test of Phu Tok Aquifer that hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifer at shallower than 50 m is 0.005-17 m/d. Transmissivity and storage coefficient are 0.05-20 m2/d and 7×10-3-0.725 respectively. The confined aquifer at depth not exceed 90 m has hydraulic conductivity value of 0.2-10 m/d while transmissivity and storage coefficient are 3.19-150 m2/d and 1×10-10-1.6×10-2. Another confined aquifer at 90-120 m of depth have hydraulic conductivity value of 0.08-15 m/d and transmissivity and storage coefficient values of 1.7-178 m2/d and 4×10-7-4.5×10-3 respectively.
  • 加载中
  • Groundwater Resources of northeastern Thailand, Somchai Wongsawat, Ora-uan Dhanesvanich and Sunthorn Punjasuthalos, 1992
    Groundwater and Well, Chalarn, 1997
    Geologogical map of northeastern Thailand, 1:100000, 1999
    Artesian Flowing Wells in Unsolidated rock Aquifer along the Mun River, S. Punjasuthalos, 1995
    Geoundwater Flow Model of Fractured Aquifer in Phu Tok Formation, Khon Kaen, NE-Thailand, Kriengsak Srisuk, 1995
    Groundwater Potenial in Mun-Chi River Basin, Department Of Groundwater Resources, 2006
    Hydrogeological map of northeastern Thailand, 1:100000, 1983
  • Relative Articles

    [1] Jia-xing Sun, Gao-fan Yue, Wei Zhang, 2023: Simulation of thermal breakthrough factors affecting carbonate geothermal-to-well systems, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 379-390.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280030
    [2] Muthamilselvan A Dr, Sekar Anamika, Ignatius Emmanuel, 2022: Identification of groundwater potential in hard rock aquifer systems using Remote Sensing, GIS and Magnetic Survey in Veppanthattai, Perambalur, Tamilnadu, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 367-380.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.04.005
    [3] Laouni Benadela, Belkacem Bekkoussa, Laouni Gaidi, 2022: Multivariate analysis and geochemical investigations of groundwater in a semi-arid region, case of superficial aquifer in Ghriss Basin, Northwest Algeria, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 233-249.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.03.003
    [4] Jin-xing Guo, Zhi-ping Li, Catalin Stefan, 2022: Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) applications in China–achievements and challenges, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 57-69.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.01.006
    [5] Yu-kun Sun, Feng Liu, Hua-jun Wang, Xin-zhi Gao, 2022: Numerical simulation of operation performance on production and injection of a double well geothermal system in Kailu Basin, Inner Mongolia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 196-208.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.02.008
    [6] Chun-lei GUI, Zhen-xing WANG, Rong MA, Xue-feng ZUO, 2021: Aquifer hydraulic conductivity prediction via coupling model of MCMC-ANN, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 1-11.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.01.001
    [7] A Muthamilselvan, 2021: Identification of suitable sites for open and bore well using ground magnetic survey, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 256-268.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.03.008
    [8] Qiao-ling YUAN, Zhi-ping LI, Lei-cheng LI, Shu-li WANG, Si-yu YAO, 2020: Pharmaceuticals and personal care products transference-transformation in aquifer system, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 358-365.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.04.006
    [9] Mehmood Qaisar, Arshad Muhammad, Rizwan Muhammad, Hamid Shanawar, Mehmood Waqas, Ansir Muneer Muhammad, Irfan Muhammad, Anjum Lubna, 2020: Integration of geoelectric and hydrochemical approaches for delineation of groundwater potential zones in alluvial aquifer, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 366-380.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.04.007
    [10] A S El-Hames, 2020: Development of a simple method for determining the influence radius of a pumping well in steady-state condition, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 97-107.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.02.001
    [11] Yacob T Tesfaldet, Avirut Puttiwongrak, Tanwa Arpornthip, 2020: Spatial and temporal variation of groundwater recharge in shallow aquifer in the Thepkasattri of Phuket, Thailand, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 10-19.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.01.002
    [12] SHU Qin-feng, WEI Liang-shuai, LI Xiao, 2019: Geological characteristics and analysis of hydrothermal genesis in the Suijiang-1 well in Yunnan Province, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 53-60.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.01.005
    [13] YANG Liu, WEN Xue-ru, WU Xiao-li, PEI Li-xin, YUE Chen, LIU Bing, GUO Si-jia, 2019: Height prediction of water flowing fractured zones based on BP artificial neural network, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 354-359.  doi: DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.04.006
    [14] MA Zhi-yuan, XU Yong, ZHAI Mei-jing, WU Min, 2017: Clogging mechanism in the process of reinjection of used geothermal water: A simulation research on Xianyang No.2 reinjection well in a super-deep and porous geothermal reservoir, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 311-325.
    [15] SRISUK Kriengsak, NETTASANA Tussanee, 2017: Climate change and groundwater resources in Thailand, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 67-75.
    [16] ZHANG Xiang-yang, CHEN Zong-yu, YANG Guo-min, TU Le-yi, HU Shui-ming, 2016: Krypton-85 dating of shallow aquifer in Hebei Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 328-332.
    [17] ZHOU Yang-xiao, Parvez Sarwer Hossain, Nico van der Moot, 2015: Analysis of travel time, sources of water and well protection zones with groundwater models, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 363-374.
    [18] , 2014: The Experimental Investigations on Motion Features of Groundwater Flow near the Pumping Well, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 1-11.
    [19] Yun TANG, Ke-wang TANG, Yan WANG, Ai-min YANG, 2014: Study of Ecological Water Demand of Rivers in Shenyang City, Northeastern China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 73-77.
    [20] ZHANG Cheng, Mahippong Worakul, WANG Jin-liang, PU Jun-bing, LYU Yong, ZHANG Qiang, HUANG Qi-bo, 2014: Hydrogeochemical Features of Karst in the Western Thailand, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 18-26.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1441) PDF downloads(2271) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    JGSE-ScholarOne Manuscript Launched on June 1, 2024.

    Online Submission

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return