Rabiranjan Prusty; Trinath Biswal

doi:10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.04.004

doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.04.004

计量
- 文章访问数: 988
- HTML全文浏览量: 388
- PDF下载量: 96
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-06-15
- 录用日期: 2020-10-10
- 刊出日期: 2020-12-28

Physico-chemical, bacteriological and health hazard effect analysis of the water in Taladanda Canal, Paradip area, Odisha, India

Department of Chemistry Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology Burla-768018, India

More Information

Corresponding author: Trinath Biswal, E-mail: biswal.trinath@gmail.com

摘要

- /
- /
- /
- /
- /
- /
Abstract: The physico-chemical and bacteriological parameters of the water in Taladanda canal and associated water-borne diseases,from which the dwellers have suffered,were studied,by using statistical method. Overuse and the addition of the wastes with sources from urbane industrial sectors,as well as the decrease in water level have caused the canal water quality declined drastically and subsequently led to extensive eutrophication and bacterial contamination. According to the water sample analytical results,the water is lightly acidic with the pH value of 4.5~6.7. The measured indexes,such as total dissolved solid (TDS),electrical conductivity (EC),total suspended solid (TSS),Mn,Zn,Al,Fe,Cu,Cr,and Hg etc,mostly have very high concentrations which are higher than permissible limit,indicating that the canal water is completely unsuitable for human consumption. Furthermore,the biological analysis shows that the total coliform (TC) is in the range of 45.9~30.2 in per 100 mL water in April,30.5~25.3/100 mL in July and 52.9~35.4/100 mL in December,respectively. Similarly,fecal coliform (FC) ranges from 12.8 to 10.1,10.5~7.5 and 13.1~6.4 per 100 mL water in the months of April,July and December respectively. As a result,people who use the water have suffered from different water-borne diseases. On the basis of disease data derived from hospital observations in a period of three years,there had been 4 284 people affected by different water-borne diseases from 2016 to 2018.
- Water quality /
- Pollution /
- Physico-chemical assessment /
- Bacteriological parameters /
- Health hazard /
- Coliform /
- E. coli

HTML全文

Figure 1. Location map of the study area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 2. Statistical graph of the number of people infected by various diseases

Data 1: The disease diarrhea; data 2: The giardia and cryptosporidium; data 3: Dysentery; data 4: Salmonella; data 5: Escherichia; data 6: Typhoid fever; data 7: Cholera; data 8: The hepatitis A; data 9: Campylobacter.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 3. Kind of diseases vs number of people affected in 2016, in which the most people affected by typhoid and the least people affected in escherichia coli, comparing with other water-borne diseases

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 4. Kind of diseases vs number of people affected in 2017, in which the most people affected by typhoid fever and least people by giardia and cryptosporidium

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 5. Kind of diseases vs number of people affected in 2018 when the most people affected by typhoid disease and the least by escherichia coli

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Table 1. The disease that transmitted through the drinking water

Disease	Bacterial agent
Cholera	Vibrio cholera
Vibrios caused by gastroenteritis	Vibrio parahaemolyticus
Typhoid fever	Salmonella typhi
Bacillary dysentery or shigellosis	Shigelladysenteriae, shigellaflexneri, shigellaboydii, shigellasonnei
Gastroenteritis and acute diarrheas	Escherichia coli, particularly serotype

下载: 导出CSV

Table 2. Water parameters, source of occurrence and effect

Parameters	Occurrence	Effect
Turbidity	Soil runoff	Cause of pathogens
Colour	Dissolved colloidal form of materials
Odour	Degradation by bacterial community	Disagreeable odour
Electrical Conductivity	Presence of dissolved solid in water in ionic form	If the concentration of ionisable ions is high the conductivity will be more and the property of corrosion increases
pH	Because of different gas and solid mate-rials	Cause of bitterness and corrosion of the materials
DO	Because of oxygen present in the dis-solved state in water	Most corrosive gas in the environment and cause of corrosion in water and oil pipe lines, boilers, machinery parts, automobile parts
TH	Presence of chloride, sulphates and bicar-bonates of Ca and Mg salts. Mostly found in some mineral present in water	Cause of decrease in foam producing capacity with soap solution
TA (Total Alkalinity)	Because of the presence of the different alkaline gases in dissolved state	Cause of embrittlement in bottom part of boiler steel
TDS	Because of the dissolved fine particles of solid materials and salts	Cause of Gastro-intestinal diseases, eye irritation and corrosion of some metals
Calcium (Ca)	Found from soap and anions of some dissolved salts.	Influencing in the dying process of textile indus-tries

下载: 导出CSV

Table 3. Bacteriological analysis of drinking water samples in the Paradip City

Water samples collected at different areas of Paradip City	MPN test in April-2018		MPN test in July-2018		MPN test in December-2018
	TC Bacteria/100 mL	FC Bacteria/100 mL	TC Bacteria/100 mL	FC Bacteria/100 mL	TC Bacteria/100 mL	FC Bacteria/100 mL
S1	38.2	10.1	25.3	9.2	45.2	10.2
S2	44.4	12.4	29.3	8.8	39.1	11.2
S3	42.5	11.3	31.4	8.5	35.4	10.5
S4	42.2	10.5	30.4	8.7	36.2	12.1
S5	45.9	11.2	30.5	9.9	37.5	11.3
S6	45.6	11.5	31.1	9.2	44.1	10.2
S7	30.2	11.2	32.1	9.6	36.1	10.5
S8	48.5	10.6	26.4	9.1	41.2	11.5
S9	32.4	10.7	29.5	8.2	40.2	8.4
S10	32.2	10.5	25.6	8.1	41.6	7.9
S11	32.2	10.4	26.5	8.5	40.5	6.4
S12	40.3	11.2	26.4	7.9	45.6	10.4
S13	35.5	10.4	26.3	7.5	46.2	6.5
S14	34.2	11.4	28.9	9.5	46.2	7.6
S15	52.4	12.8	26.6	10.5	52.9	13.1

下载: 导出CSV

Table 4. Analysis of physico-chemical parameters in April, 2018

Parameters	Water samples collected in Paradip City during first series
Parameters	L1	L2	L3	L4	L5	L6	L7	L8	L9	L10	L11	L12	L13	L14	L15
Temperature (℃)	20	19	18	19	19	20	19	19	19	18	18	20	19	21	18
Colour	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL
Odour	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL
pH	6.7	6.6	6.5	6.2	6.5	6.5	6.4	6.4	6.5	6.3	6.4	6.6	6.5	6.6	6.4
EC (µs/cm)	311	318	312	311	314	311	315	314	316	319	317	318	314	316	317
TDS (ppm)	751.2	754.2	759.4	752.6	758.6	745.2	746.2	749.2	746.5	742.3	750.1	760.4	764.4	741.2	740.5
TSS (mg/L)	375.1	378.4	382.1	384.1	389.1	377.4	378.2	389.1	389.4	398.4	385.4	387.8	398.4	388.4	385.4
TH (ppm)	48	38	47	49	31	37	37	31	52	53	46	43	54	47	59
Ca (mg/L)	32	40	44	48	32	44	40	27	44	40	40	55	44	48	44
Mg (mg/L)	24	27	30	30	28	35	41	26	17	15	17	30	37	40	27
Cl (mg/L)	46	34	40	29	32	31	30	37	35	38	31	40	41	31	37
DO (mg/L)	4.9	4.5	4.7	5.9	5.01	4.2	4.9	4.8	4.7	4.6	4.8	4.7	4.4	5.1	5.1
NO₂^- (mg/L)	28	29	28	25	36	35	41	28	36	3.9	29	32	38	27	31
NO₃^- (mg/L)	30	50	30	20	30	30	45	58	35	50	50	40	20	20	48
SO₄^2- (mg/L)	25	24	32	24	35	24	25	29	27	26	24	28	24	26	26
Alkalinity	100	150	200	150	150	100	150	150	120	120	100	100	120	100	100
Mn (mg/L)	0.1	0.3	0.4	0.8	0.5	0.2	0.4	0.7	0.8	0.8	0.5	0.6	0.1	0.4	0.4
Zn (mg/L)	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.2	0.8	0.2	0.3	0.1	0.6	0.4	0.3	0.1
Al (mg/L)	0.2	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.01	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.2	0.5	0.1
F (mg/L)	1.5	0.2	0.2	0.8	0.5	2.4	1.7	1.5	1.9	0.2	0.2	1.8	0.6	1.5	1.2
Fe (mg/L)	0.9	0.6	0.8	0.5	0.9	0.9	0.6	0.9	0.1	0.1	0.5	1.2	0.9	1.6	1.4
Cu (mg/L)	0.2	0.5	0.1	0.2	0.5	0.9	0.2	0.2	0.4	0.5	0.1	0.1	0.9	0.3	1
Cr (mg/L)	0.1	0.5	0.5	0.1	0.3	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.2	0.1
Hg (mg/L)	0.01	0.03	0.02	0.01	0.04	0.03	0.01	0.02	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.03	0.02	0.01

下载: 导出CSV

Table 5. Analysis of physico-chemical parameters in July, 2018

Parameters	Water samples collected in Paradip City during second series
Parameters	L1	L2	L3	L4	L5	L6	L7	L8	L9	L10	L11	L12	L13	L14	L15
Temperature (℃)	21	18	21	20	17	22	18	21	22	19	19	20	19	17	21
Colour	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL
Odour	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL
pH	6.4	5.3	5.2	5.5	5.2	5.1	4.9	4.6	5.2	4.8	4.5	5.1	4.6	5.1	5.3
EC (µs/cm)	299	306	305	300	301	302	304	307	304	304	302	304	303	299	300
TDS (ppm)	850.1	863.5	846.2	851.3	831.2	825.1	851.2	831.4	862.1	843.2	856.4	854.5	859.4	863.1	839.1
TSS (mg/L)	423.2	452.3	421.6	413.2	411.2	429.5	427.4	425.2	427.1	426.1	411.2	419.4	416.2	418.5	417.2
TH (ppm)	27	26	31	28	26	21	27	29	24	24	25	23	21	24	28
Ca (mg/L)	36	44	32.6	52	38	55	40	32	28	32	35	32	28.5	36	30
Mg (mg/L)	30.1	35	30.1	26	40	25	27	32	33	19	30	27	34	28	25
Cl (mg/L)	19	31	24	21	20	25	26	21	19	23	24	25	26	21	19
DO (mg/L)	5.1	5.2	5	3.7	3.6	3.5	3.4	4.9	4.5	4.7	4.5	4.3	4.2	4.1	4.2
NO₂^- (mg/L)	35	32	30	26	35	52	42	37	27	25	50	35	42	42	40
NO₃^- (mg/L)	24	26	25	30	45	48	41	46	48	43	35	38	35	31	34
SO₄^2- (mg/L)	25	19	32	18	35	21	25	18	27	26	24	15	19	21	26
Alkalinity	150	120	120	100	100	120	100	100	100	150	200	150	150	100	130
Mn (mg/L)	0.1	0.2	0.5	0.8	0.7	0.2	0.4	0.7	0.4	0.7	0.5	0.6	0.1	0.3	0.4
Zn (mg/L)	0.3	0.4	0.1	0.2	0.4	0.4	0.2	0.7	0.2	0.6	0.1	0.6	0.4	0.3	0.1
Al (mg/L)	0.6	2.3	1.1	0.6	0.8	1.1	1.6	1.2	1.1	0.2	0.8	0.6	0.7	1	1.2
F (mg/L)	1	0.5	0.3	0.9	0.8	1.2	1.1	0.7	1.2	0.3	0.9	0.8	0.8	0.8	1
Fe (mg/L)	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.4	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1
Cu (mg/L)	0.1	0.4	0.1	0.2	0.5	0.9	0.3	0.2	0.6	0.5	0.1	0.1	0.9	0.3	1.0
Cr (mg/L)	0.1	0.5	0.5	0.1	0.3	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.2	0.1
Hg (mg/L)	0.02	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.04	0.03	0.01	0.02	0.03	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.03	0.02	0.01

下载: 导出CSV

Table 6. Analysis of physicochemical parameters in December, 2018

Parameters	Water samples collected in Paradip City during third series
Parameters	L1	L2	L3	L4	L5	L6	L7	L8	L9	L10	L11	L12	L13	L14	L15
Temperature (℃)	20	19	18	19	19	20	19	19	19	18	18	20	19	21	18
Colour	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL
Odour	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL	OL
PH	4.5	4.6	4.2	5.2	4.8	4.9	5.3	4.6	4.5	5.1	5.3	4.9	6.2	5.9	5.4
EC (µs/cm)	301	305	303	302	305	306	312	311	310	314	315	311	309	308	314
TDS (ppm)	700.4	709.1	720.6	700.1	710.6	708.4	709.5	707.7	709.2	712.5	720.4	711.6	713.4	711.5	718.6
TSS (mg/L)	351.6	345.6	340.2	346.4	351.5	360.4	342.6	349.2	339.5	347.6	346.7	340.8	353.4	351.4	350.4
TH (ppm)	26	24	31	29	26	21	27	29	24	24	25	23	26	24	28
Ca (mg/L)	32	40	44	48	32	44	40	27	44	40	40	55	44	48	44
Mg (mg/L)	24	27	30	30	28	35	41	26	17	15	17	30	37	40	27
Cl (mg/L)	106	78	99	106	72	78	90	106	90	78	78	90	108	150	110
DO (mg/L)	5.8	5.9	5.8	4.5	5.6	5.5	5.0	5.8	5.6	5.9	5.9	5.2	5.8	5.7	5.3
NO₂^- (mg/L)	30	50	30	20	30	30	45	58	35	50	50	40	20	20	48
NO₃^- (mg/L)	120	120	120	100	120	100	120	80	80	100	115	90	90	120	110
SO₄^2- (mg/L)	100	150	200	150	150	100	150	150	120	120	100	100	120	100	100
Alkalinity	100	100	150	200	150	150	100	130	150	120	120	100	100	120	100
Mn (mg/L)	0.3	0.2	0.5	0.7	0.7	0.2	0.4	0.7	0.2	0.7	0.5	0.6	0.1	0.3	0.4
Zn (mg/L)	0.3	0.4	0.1	0.2	0.4	0.4	0.2	0.7	0.2	0.5	0.1	0.6	0.4	0.3	0.1
Al (mg/L)	1.5	0.2	0.2	0.8	0.5	2.4	1.7	1.5	1.9	0.2	0.2	1.8	0.6	2.5	1.9
F (mg/L)	0.9	0.6	0.8	0.5	0.9	0.9	0.6	0.9	0.1	0.1	0.5	1.2	0.9	1.6	1.4
Fe (mg/L)	0.2	0.5	0.1	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.2	0.4	0.5	0.7	0.1	0.6	0.7	0.3	1
Cu (mg/L)	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.4	0.9	0.3	0.2	0.7	0.5	0.1	0.1	0.8	0.3	1
Cr (mg/L)	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.1	0.3	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.2	0.1
Hg (mg/L)	0.02	0.04	0.02	0.02	0.05	0.03	0.01	0.01	0.03	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.05	0.02	0.07

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(32)

APHA. 2005. Standard methods for the examina-tion of water and wastewater. 21st Edition, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC.

Barik RN, Pradhan B, Patel RK. 2005. Trace elements in groundwater of Paradip area. Journal of Industrial Pollution Control, 21(2): 355-362. http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_other_thesis/0204110350376.html

Cabral JPS. 2010. Water microbiology. Bacterial pathogens and water. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(10): 3657-3703. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph7103657.

Chatanga P, Ntuli V, Mugomeri E, et al. 2019. Situational analysis of physico-chemical, biochemical and microbiological quality of water along Mohok are river, Lesotho. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 45: 45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejar.2018.12.002

Das J, Singh BK, Sahoo RK. 2002. Urban ground water pollution: A case study in Cuttack City, India. Ground Water Monitoring and Reme-diation, 22(3): 95-103. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00758.x

Das PD, Karim AA, Panda RB. 2013. Assessment of groundwater quality in and around Para-deep phosphate limited at Paradeep area, Odisha, India. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 4(10): 1459-1464. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/273124900_assessment_of_groundwater_quality_in_and_around_paradeep_phosphate_limited_at_paradeep_area_odisha_india

Das PP, Mohapatra PP, Sahoo HK, et al. 2016. A geospatial analysis of fluoride contamination of groundwater in Paradeep area, Odisha, India. Environmental Geochemistry, 19(1 & 2): 11-14. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/316989430_A_GEOSPATIAL_ANALYSIS_OF_FLUORIDE_CONTAMINATION_OF_GROUNDWATER_IN_PARADEEP_AREA_ODISHA_INDIA

Das SK, Gerwal AS, Bamerjee M. 2011. A brief review: Heavy metal and their analysis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 11(1): 13-18.

Duressa G, Assefa F, Jida M. 2019. Assessment of bacteriological and physicochemical quality of drinking water from source to household tap connection in Nekemte, Oromia, Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 1-7. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2019/2129792

Gupta N, Pandey P, Hussain J. 2017. Effect of physicochemical and biological parameters on the quality of river water of Narmada, Madhya Pradesh, India. Water Science, 31(1): 11-23. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.wsj.2017.03.002.

Gwimbi P, George M, Ramphalile M. 2019. Bac-terial contamination of drinking water sources in rural villages of Mohale Basin, Lesotho: exposures through neighborhood sanitation and hygiene practices, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 24: 33-40. Doi: 10.1186/s12199-019-0790-z

Hosseini N, Johnston J, Lindenschmidt K. 2017. Impacts of climate change on the water quality of a regulated Prairie River. Water, 9(3): 1-15. Doi: 10.3390/w9030199

Huntington T, Nimmo F, Macfadyen G. 2015. Fish landings at the world's commercial fishing ports. Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics, 2(1): 1-9. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.15351/2373-8456.1031

ISI. 1983. Indian standard: Specification for drinking water, New Delhi. India: Indian Standards Institution.

Kar T, Debata S. 2019. Breeding ecology of the endangered black-bellied tern (Sterna acuticauda) in eastern India and implications for conservation. Water Birds, 42(3): 314-320. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1675/063.042.0307

Kiss J. 2019. Pesticides in agriculture: Are we sustainable yet? Journal of Consumer Protec-tion and Food Safety, 14: 205-207. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00003-019-01246-0

Lultle DR, Siwakoti M, Jha PK. 2019. Climate change and finger millet: Perception, trend and impact on yield in different ecological regions in Central Nepal. Journal of Mountain Science, 16(4):821-835. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11629-018-5165-1

Mansoori N, Bakar I, Shahid N, et al. 2018. Microbial contamination; A survey of microbial contamination of toothbrushes among general population of Karachi. The Professional Medical Journal, 25(11): 1785-1790. Doi: 10.29309/TPMJ/18.4456

Melki S, Asmi AME, Gueddari M. 2019. Inferred industrial and agricultural activities impact on groundwater quality of Skhira Coastal Phreatic Aquifer in southeast of Tunisia (Mediterranean Region), Geofluids: 1-19. Doi: 10.1155/2019/9465498

Mishra B. 2010. Agriculture, industry and mining in Orissa in the Post-Liberalization Era: An inter-district and inter-state panel analysis. Economic & Political Weekly, 15: 49-68. Doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27807027

Mishra K, Nayak PL. 2014. A study of water pollution in two major rivers in Odisha-Mahanadi and Brahmani. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 22(12): 1760-1770. Doi: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.22.12.21634

Murali RM, Shrivastava D, Vethamony P. 2009. Monitoring shoreline environment of Paradip, east coast of India using remote sensing. Current Science, 97(1): 79-84. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=AV20120145001

Pal P, Sarangi DK. 2018. Impact of biomedical waste on Cuttack City. Current World Envi-ronment, 13(2): 259-269. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.12944/CWE.13.2.11

Palei NC, Rath BP, Pradhan SD, et al. 2014. The water birds of paradeep phosphate limited (PPL) campus of Jagatsinghpur District in Odisha, India. World Journal of Zoology, 9(3): 208-213. Doi: 10.5829/idosi.wjz.2014.9.3.8552.

Panda PK, Panda RB, Dash PK. 2018. The river water pollution in India & abroad-A critical review to study the relationship among different physico-chemical parameters. American Journal of Water Resources, 6(1): 25-38. Doi: 10.12691/ajwr-6-1-4

Panigrahi AK, Pattnaik S. 2019. A Review on consequences of pollution of some Indian major rivers and their remedial measures. International Journal of Research & Review, 6(7): 373-383. Doi: http://www.inrein.com/10.4444/ijrr.1002/1233.html

Prusty R, Biswal T. 2017. Water quality assessment of Taladanda canal in the command area of Cuttack City. International Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Tech-nology, 4(8): 40-48.

Rai S, Kaur A, Sethi GK, et al. 2019. Association of fecal micro flora with bronchiolitis. The Indian Journal of Pediatric, 86(8): 757. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12098-019-02929-0

Samantray P, Mishra BK, Panda CR, et al. 2009. Assessment of water quality index in Ma-hanadi and Atharbanki River and Taladanda canal in Paradip area, India. Journal of Human Ecology, 26(3):153-161. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09709274.2009.11906177

Samantray P, Pati RC, Panda CR, et al. 2011. The problem of ground water pollution: A case study from Paradip Port City, India. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry, 4(6): 957-959. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=109498660&site=ehost-live

Sentas A, Psilovikos A, Psilovikos T, et al. 2016. Statistical analysis and assessment of water quality parameters in Pagoneri, River Nestos. European Water, 55: 115-126. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/320869295_Statistical_Analysis_and_Assessment_of_Water_Quality_Parameters_in_Pagoneri_River_Nestos

Shukla DP, Vaghela KB, Jain NK. 2017. Assess-ment of physico-chemical and bacteriological water quality parameters: A review. Interna-tional Journal of Pharmacy and Integrated Life Sciences, 5(2): 1-17. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/314951607_Assessment_of_Physico-chemical_and_Bacteriological_Water_Quality_Parameters_A_Review

[1]	Fu-ning Lan, Yi Zhao, Jun Li, Xiu-qun Zhu2024: Health risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in groundwater of a karst basin, SW China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12, 49-61. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280005
[2]	Masoud H Hamed, Rebwar N Dara, Marios C Kirlas2024: Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a GIS-based DRASTIC method in the Erbil Dumpsite area (Kani Qirzhala), Central Erbil Basin, North Iraq, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12, 16-33. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280003
[3]	Chun-xiao Wang, Yong Qian, Zhao-ji Zhang, Chen Yue, Chun-yan Guo, Xiang-xiang Cui2023: Current status and prospects of research on 1,4-dioxane pollution and treatment technologies in the water environment, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 158-170. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280014
[4]	Kirlas Marios C2021: Assessment of porous aquifer hydrogeological parameters using automated groundwater level measurements in Greece, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 269-278. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.04.001
[5]	Ahmed Mohammad Tofayal, Monir Minhaj Uddin, Hasan Md Yeasir, Rahman Md Mominur, Rifat Md Shamiul Islam, Islam Md Naim, Khan Abu Shamim, Rahman Md Mizanur, Islam Md Shajidul2020: Hydro-geochemical evaluation of groundwater with studies on water quality index and suitability for drinking in Sagardari, Jashore, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 259-273. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.03.006
[6]	Negar Fathi, Mohammad Bagher Rahnama, Mohammad Zounemat Kermani2020: Spatial analysis of groundwater quality for drinking purpose in Sirjan Plain, Iran by fuzzy logic in GIS, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 67-78. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.01.007
[7]	Bahrami Mehdi, Khaksar Elmira, Khaksar Elahe2020: Spatial variation assessment of groundwater quality using multivariate statistical analysis(Case Study: Fasa Plain, Iran), Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 230-243. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.03.004
[8]	LI Yang, KANG Feng-Xin, ZOU An-de2019: Isotope analysis of nitrate pollution sources in groundwater of Dong’e geohydrological unit, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 145-154. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.02.005
[9]	HU Zun-fang, KANG Feng-xin, ZOU An-de, YU Lin-song, LI Yang, TIAN Tong-liang, KANG Gui-ling2019: Evolution trend of the water quality in Dongping Lake after South-North Water Transfer Project in China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 333-339. doi: DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.04.004
[10]	T K G P Ranasinghe, R U K Piyadasa2019: Visualizing the spatial water quality of Bentota, Sri Lanka in the presence of seawater intrusion, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 340-353. doi: DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.04.005
[11]	WU Ting-wen, WANG Li-huan, WANG Lin-shu, KONG Qing-xuan2018: Evaluation of groundwater quality and pollution in Daqing Oilfield, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 40-48. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.01.005
[12]	Alhassan H Ismai, Muntasir A Shareef, Wesam Mahmood2018: Hydrochemical characterization of groundwater in Balad district, Salah Al-Din Governorate, Iraq, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 306-322. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.04.006
[13]	JIANG Ti-sheng, QU Ci-xiao, WANG Ming-yu, SUN Yan-wei, HU Bo, CHU Jun-yao2017: Analysis on temporal and spatial variations of groundwater hydrochemical characteristics in the past decade in southern plain of Beijing, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 235-248.
[14]	LIU Shu-yuan, WANG Hong-qi2016: Dynamic assessment of pollution risk of groundwater source area in Northern China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 333-343.
[15]	DAI Wen-Bin, ZHANG Wei-Jun, COWEN Taha2015: An analysis of River Derwent pollution and its impacts, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 39-44.
[16]	YANG Li-zhi, LIU Chun-hua2015: Study on the characteristics and causes of carbon tetrachloride pollution of karst water in eastern suburbs of Jinan, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 331-341.
[17]	LIU Jun, CHENG Jian-mei, JIANG Fang-yuan2015: Methodological study of coastal geological hazard assessment based on GIS, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 77-85.
[18]	Kang-qin HAN, Ri-sheng DUAN, Liang-liang JIA, Yuan-yuan DUAN, Min-ying FENG2014: Analysis on Present Status of Underground Water Pollution in Shijiazhuang and Its Prevention Measures, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 44-48.
[19]	B.T. Hiller, N. Jadamba2013: Groundwater Use in the Selenge River Basin, Mongolia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 11-32.
[20]	Song Bo, Liu Changli, Zhang Yun, Hou Hongbing, Pei Lixin, Yang Liu2013: Urban Waste Disposal and Its Impact on Groundwater Pollution in China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 88-95.