• pISSN 2305-7068
  • eISSN 2097-7476
  • Indexed by WOS(ESCI) CABI CAS
  • DOAJ EBSCO ProQuest Scopus GeoRef AJ CNKI
Advanced Search
Volume 14 Issue 4
Dec.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Liu JW, Zhang XQ. 2026: A signal decomposition optimized SWAT+ coupling framework for simulating groundwater response in the central plains agricultural core area: Sensitivity and land use scenarios. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 14(4): 518-534. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280092
Citation: Liu JW, Zhang XQ. 2026: A signal decomposition optimized SWAT+ coupling framework for simulating groundwater response in the central plains agricultural core area: Sensitivity and land use scenarios. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 14(4): 518-534. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280092

A signal decomposition optimized SWAT+ coupling framework for simulating groundwater response in the central plains agricultural core area: Sensitivity and land use scenarios

doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280092
More Information
  • Corresponding author: 15531894976@163.com
  • Received Date: 2025-07-23
  • Accepted Date: 2026-04-08
  • Available Online: 2026-10-10
  • Publish Date: 2026-12-15
  • Predicting groundwater depth is crucial for sustainable water management in agricultural regions facing intensive irrigation and rapid urbanization. Traditional data-driven models lack physical interpretability, while physical models like SWAT+ often struggle with non-stationary inputs, limiting their accuracy. This study proposes a novel Physics-Dominated Signal Decomposition Optimization (PD-SDO) framework that integrates SWAT+ with Extreme-point Symmetric Mode Decomposition (ESMD) to integrate physical mechanisms with data optimization. The framework is specifically designed for intensively managed mixed land-use regions, exemplified by the study area—a national strategic zone for agricultural development. Key innovations include: 1) ESMD-optimized inputs that extract high-frequency components (the first intrinsic mode function (Intrinsic Mode Function 1, IMF1), representing the highest-frequency component of the decomposed precipitation series) from precipitation to capture extreme rainfall pulses (>50 mm/d), thereby enhancing SWAT+'s adaptability to non-stationary climatic forcings prevalent in monsoon-influenced areas; 2) sensitivity-guided analysis identifying ALPHA_BF as the dominant parameter controlling groundwater recharge, which, combined with spatial heterogeneity analysis, reveals dual-mode drainage dynamics in loess-dominated unsaturated zones; 3) A closed-loop optimization where residual analysis dynamically adjusts ESMD thresholds, enabling model self-optimization; 4) Quantified land-use impacts showing contrasting hydrological effects under afforestation and urbanization scenarios, providing direct insights for spatial planning. The framework significantly improves simulation accuracy for groundwater depth, achieving a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.94 and a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 8.02 m, which represents a 23% gain over the standalone SWAT+. It also enhances computational efficiency by 40% with minimal accuracy loss and provides 2.3× greater physical interpretability than pure black-box models. PD-SDO offers a replicable solution for high-fidelity groundwater modeling in rapidly changing mixed land-use zones, effectively balancing mechanistic fidelity with predictive performance. The framework and its findings provide a scientific basis for optimizing water allocation and land use management within strategic agricultural regions.
  • 加载中
  • Abbas SA, Bailey RT, White JT, et al. 2024. A framework for parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty analysis for holistic hydrologic modeling using SWAT+. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(1): 21−48. DOI:  10.5194/hess-28-21-2024.
    Abbas SA, White JT, Almahawis MK, et al. 2025. Dual-phase calibration for surface–subsurface hydrologic models with diverse hydrologic conditions. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 30(4): 04025019. DOI:  10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6479.
    Bawa A, Mendoza K, Srinivasan R, et al. 2025. Enhancing hydrological modeling of ungauged watersheds through machine learning and physical similarity-based regionalization of calibration parameters. Environmental Modelling & Software, 186: 106335. DOI:  10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106335.
    Chen S, Fu YH, Wu Z, et al. 2023. Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes. Journal of Hydrology, 616: 128817. DOI:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128817.
    Costa RCA, Santos RMB, Fernandes LFS, et al. 2023. Hydrologic response to land use and land cover change scenarios: An example from the Paraopeba River Basin based on the SWAT model. Water, 15(8): 1451. DOI:  10.3390/w15081451.
    Dai J, Pan L, Deng Y, et al. 2025. Modified SWAT model for agricultural watershed in Karst Area of Southwest China. Agriculture, 15(2): 192. DOI:  10.3390/agriculture15020192.
    Gu X, Long A, He X, et al. 2024. Response of runoff to climate change in the Manas River Basin flow-producing area, Northwest China. Applied Water Science, 14(3): 43. DOI:  10.1007/s13201-023-02099-7.
    Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, et al. 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 454(1971): 903−995. DOI:  10.1098/rspa.1998.0193.
    Jahanshahi A, Asadi H, Gupta H. 2025. A data fusion approach to enhancing runoff simulation in a semi-arid river basin. Environmental Modelling & Software, 190: 106468. DOI:  10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106468.
    Jeong H, Lee B, Kim D, et al. 2024. Improving estimation capacity of a hybrid model of LSTM and SWAT by reducing parameter uncertainty. Journal of Hydrology, 633: 130942. DOI:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130942.
    Luo Y, Chen J, Gao S, et al. 2017. Stability analysis of super-large-section tunnel in loess ground considering water infiltration caused by irrigation. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(22): 763. DOI:  10.1007/s12665-017-7106-7.
    Ma J, Li Z, Ma B, et al. 2020. Determination of groundwater recharge mechanisms using stable isotopes in small watersheds of the Loess Plateau, China. Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2): 765−781. DOI:  10.1007/s10040-020-02253-4.
    Mosbahi M, Kassouk Z, Benabdallah S, et al. 2023. Modeling hydrological responses to land use change in Sejnane Watershed, Northern Tunisia. Water, 15(9): 1737. DOI:  10.3390/w15091737.
    Nguyen TV, Dietrich J, Dang TD, et al. 2022. An interactive graphical interface tool for parameter calibration, sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis, and visualization for the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Environmental Modelling & Software, 156: 105497. DOI:  10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105497.
    Re V, De Filippis G, Viaroli S, et al. 2020. Groundwater (Freeze and Cherry, 1979), ora disponibile anche in italiano. Acque Sotterranee - Italian Journal of Groundwater, 9(1): 89−90. DOI:  10.7343/as-2020-453.
    Rivera-Fernandez AS, Cotrina-Sanchez A, Salas López R, et al. 2025. Spatiotemporal land cover change and future hydrological impacts under climate scenarios in the Amazonian Andes: A case study of the Utcubamba River Basin. Land, 14(6): 1234. DOI:  10.3390/land14061234.
    Rong Y, Zeng S, Qin C, et al. 2024. Holistic parameter sensitivity: A new perspective to address the risk brought by multi-source deep uncertainty on watershed management. Journal of Environmental Management, 372: 122983. DOI:  10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122983.
    Sang S, Li L. 2024. A stock prediction method based on heterogeneous bidirectional LSTM. Applied Sciences, 14(20): 9158. DOI:  10.3390/app14209158.
    Shishegar S, Ghorbani R, Saad Saoud L, et al. 2021. Rainfall–runoff modelling using octonion-valued neural networks. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(13): 1857−1865. DOI:  10.1080/02626667.2021.1962885.
    Shukla S, Meshesha TW, Sen IS, et al. 2023. Assessing impacts of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) change on stream flow and runoff in Rur Basin, Germany. Sustainability, 15(12): 9811. DOI:  10.3390/su15129811.
    Talebizadeh M, Moriasi DN, Steiner JL, et al. 2024. Spatio-temporal sensitivity analysis for flow and sediment load modeling using SWAT in a heterogeneous agricultural watershed. Water Resources Management, 39(5): 2281−2298. DOI:  10.1007/s11269-024-04066-6.
    Valencia S, Villegas JC, Hoyos N, et al. 2024. Streamflow response to land use/land cover change in the tropical Andes using multiple SWAT model variants. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 54: 101888. DOI:  10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101888.
    Wang JL, Li ZJ. 2013. Extreme-point symmetric mode decomposition method for data analysis. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 5(3): 1350015. DOI:  10.1142/S1793536913500155.
    Wang K, Tan W, Si Y, et al. 2024. A solute transport in deformable dual-porosity media using mixture-coupling theory. Environmental Geotechnics, 11(3): 165−179. DOI:  10.1680/jenge.22.00029.
    Wu S, Dong Z, Guzmán SM, et al. 2024. Two-step hybrid model for monthly runoff prediction utilizing integrated machine learning algorithms and dual signal decompositions. Ecological Informatics, 84: 102914. DOI:  10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102914.
    Yilmaz AG, Muttil N, Adhikary SK. 2018. Improving streamflow forecast using optimal rain gauge network-based input to artificial neural network models. Hydrology Research, 49(5): 1559−1577. DOI:  10.2166/nh.2017.108.
    Yu H, Wen X, Feng Q, et al. 2017. Comparative study of hybrid-wavelet artificial intelligence models for monthly groundwater depth forecasting inextreme arid regions, Northwest China. Water Resources Management, 32(1): 301−323. DOI:  10.1007/s11269-017-1811-6.
    Zhang Q, Wu J, Liu W, et al. 2025. SWAT+ model enhanced with dynamic phenology remote sensing and high-precision precipitation data for water resource vulnerability assessment in semi-arid regions. Water Resources Management, 39(10): 4947−4969. DOI:  10.1007/s11269-025-04182-x.
  • 2305-7068/© Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)

  • Relative Articles

    [1] Zheng Lu, De-hui Ning, Hui-bin Yang, Hai-rui Hao, Li-min Liao, Xi-xi Lan, Cheng-zhi Hao, Xu Zhou, Juan Bai, Jin-hui Wu, Sha-sha Meng, 2026: Spatiotemporal dynamics of water table depth in Southwest China (1958–2015) under complex hydrogeological settings, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 14, 493-517.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280091
    [2] Reza Seraj Ebrahimi, Saeid Eslamian, Mohammad Javad Zareian, 2026: Groundwater level response to different withdrawal scenarios (Case study: Talesh Aquifer, Iran), Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 14, 199-212.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280079
    [3] Jing-tao Shi, Ge Gao, Jun-jian Liu, Yu-ge Jiang, Bo Li, Xiao-yan Hao, Jun-chao Zhang, Zhao-yi Li, Huan Sun, 2025: Ecological vulnerability assessment and driving force analysis of small watersheds in Hilly Regions using sensitivity-resilience-pressure modeling, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 13, 209-224.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280050
    [4] Sulistiani, Rachmat Fajar Lubis, I Putu Santikayasa, Muh. Taufik, Gumilar Utamas Nugraha, 2025: Groundwater recharge modeling with integration of land use/land cover and climate change projections in Surakarta City, Indonesia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 13, 352-370.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280059
    [5] Hanane Mebarki, Noureddine Maref, Mohammed El-Amine Dris, 2024: Modelling the monthly hydrological balance using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model: A case study of the Wadi Mina upstream watershed, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12, 161-177.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280013
    [6] Yousef Al-Abed Allah Malik, Omar Abu Abbas Mohammad, 2023: Experimental investigation of the impact of water depth, inlet water temperature, and fins on the productivity of a Pyramid Solar Still, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 183-190.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280016
    [7] Muhammad Irfan, Sri Safrina, Erry Koriyanti, Netty Kurniawati, Khairul Saleh, Iskhaq Iskandar, 2023: Effects of climate anomaly on rainfall, groundwater depth, and soil moisture on peatlands in South Sumatra, Indonesia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 81-88.  doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280008
    [8] Shima Nasiri, Hossein Ansari, Ali Naghi Ziaei, 2022: Determination of water balance equation components in irrigated agricultural watersheds using SWAT and MODFLOW models : A case study of Samalqan plain in Iran, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 44-56.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.01.005
    [9] Ruo-xi Yuan, Gui-ling Wang, Feng Liu, Wei Zhang, Wan-li Wang, Sheng-wei Cao, 2021: Evaluation of shallow geothermal energy resources in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Plain based on land use, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 129-139.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.02.005
    [10] Zhao-xian Zheng, Xiao-shun Cui, Pu-cheng Zhu, Si-jia Guo, 2021: Sensitivity assessment of strontium isotope as indicator of polluted groundwater for hydraulic fracturing flowback fluids produced in the Dameigou Shale of Qaidam Basin, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 93-101.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.02.001
    [11] Min Liu, Zhen-long Nie, Le Cao, Li-fang Wang, Hui-xiong Lu, Zhe Wang, Pu-cheng Zhu, 2021: Comprehensive evaluation on the ecological function of groundwater in the Shiyang River watershed, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 326-340.  doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.04.006
    [12] XIA Ri-yuan, 2016: Groundwater resources in karst area in Southern China and sustainable utilization pattern, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 301-309.
    [13] JIA Rui-liang, ZHOU Jin-long, LI Qiao, LI Yang, 2015: Analysis of evaporation of high-salinity phreatic water at a burial depth of 0 m in an arid area, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 1-8.
    [14] XU Guang-ming, QI Jian-feng, BI Pan, BAI Gao-feng, 2015: Distribution and evolution features of salinized soil in Hebei Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 21-29.
    [15] ZHANG Shao-cai, LIU Li-jun, LIU Zhi-gang, WANG Jun-jie, CUI Qiu-ping, WANG Juan, 2014: Method for groundwater research in bedrock of mountainous area of Hebei, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 97-104.
    [16] LIU Li-jun, LIU Zhi-gang, LI Dou, ZHANG Shao-cai, CUI Qiu-ping, WANG Juan, 2014: Evaluation of groundwater supply capacity for agricultural drought emergency relief of Hebei Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 36-45.
    [17] , 2013: ESR Signal Intensity and Crystallinity of Quartz from Three Major Asian Dust Sources: Implication for Tracing the Provenances of Eolian Dust, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 53-67.
    [18] Richard E. Jackson, 2013: Education and Core Competencies for Professional Hydrogeologists, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 9-13.
    [19] B.T. Hiller, N. Jadamba, 2013: Groundwater Use in the Selenge River Basin, Mongolia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 11-32.
    [20] Jiankang Zhang, Yanpei Cheng, Hua Dong, Qingshi Guo, Kun Liu, Fawang Zhang, 2013: Study on Ecological Environment and Sustainable Land Use Based on Satellite Remote Sensing, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 89-96.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(8)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (11) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return