Evaluation of groundwater artificial recharge potential in the western Huaibei Plain, China

Pei-gui Liu; Ying-kang Yuan; Man-ting Shang; Zhi Li; Meng Liu

doi:10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280093

Volume 14 Issue 4

Dec. 2026

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering > 2026 > 14(4): 535-554

Liu PG, Yuan YK, Shang MT, Li Z, Liu M. 2026: Evaluation of groundwater artificial recharge potential in the western Huaibei Plain, China. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 14(4): 535-554. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280093

Citation:

PDF( 10575 KB)

Evaluation of groundwater artificial recharge potential in the western Huaibei Plain, China

doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280093

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
2.
Anhui and Huaihe River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Hefei 230088, China

More Information

Corresponding author: liupg2512@163.com
Received Date: 2025-01-27
Accepted Date: 2026-04-16

Available Online: 2026-10-10

Publish Date: 2026-12-15

Abstract

Abstract

To mitigate groundwater overexploitation and support the scientifically informed siting of artificial recharge infrastructure in the western Huaibei Plain, this study develops a multi-criteria evaluation framework for recharge suitability, focusing on the western portion of the Huaibei Plain. The framework integrates five hydrogeologically significant indicators: Groundwater table depth, saturated thickness of the primary aquifer, hydraulic conductivity, precipitation infiltration coefficient, and proximity to perennial rivers. Indicator weights were determined through a hybrid weighting strategy—combining the analytic hierarchy process, criteria importance through intercriteria correlation, and coefficient of variation methods—to balance subjective judgment with objective data-driven variance. These weights were spatially implemented using ArcGIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis to generate a continuous recharge suitability index map. The integrated weights derived from the hybrid approach are 0.222, 0.254, 0.173, 0.185, and 0.166 for the respective indicators. Recharge suitability was classified into four ordinal categories—high, moderate, low, and unsuitable—using the natural breaks optimization method. High and moderate potential zones collectively occupy 32.93% of the study area and are predominantly located in Funan, Qiaocheng, Guoyang, and Mengcheng counties—regions identified as priority candidates for artificial recharge project implementation. A sensitivity analysis confirms the stability and reliability of the zoning outcomes under parameter perturbation. By quantitatively identifying dominant controlling factors, delineating spatially explicit potential classes, and pinpointing priority implementation zones, this study establishes a transferable methodological framework. It directly supports sustainable groundwater management in the western Huaibei Plain and offers actionable guidance for optimizing recharge infrastructure placement. Moreover, the approach demonstrates broad applicability for recharge potential assessment and integrated water resources planning in hydrologically similar alluvial plain settings.
- Groundwater artificial recharge,
- Potential level,
- Coupled method,
- Sensitivity analysis,
- Huaibei Plain

FullText(HTML)

References(44)

References

Agarwal R, Garg PK. 2016. Remote sensing and GIS based groundwater potential & recharge zones mapping using multi-criteria decision making technique. Water Resources Management, 30: 243−260. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-015-1159-8.

Ajjur SB, Mogheir YK. 2019. Identification of intrinsic suitable sites in Gaza Strip for the application of artificial groundwater recharge using a geographic information system multicriteria decision analysis. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 27: 255−265. DOI: 10.1002/mcda.1701.

Aju CD, Achu AL, Raicy MC, et al. 2021. Identification of suitable sites and structures for artificial groundwater recharge for sustainable water resources management in Vamanapuram River Basin, South India. HydroResearch, 4: 24−37. DOI: 10.1016/j.hydres.2021.04.001.

Aloui D, Chekirbane A, Stefan C, et al. 2022. Use of a GIS-multi-criteria decision analysis and web-based decision support tools for mapping and sharing managed aquifer recharge feasibility in Enfidha plain, NE of Tunisia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15: 658. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-09893-8.

Arya S, Subramani T, Karunanidhi D. 2020. Delineation of groundwater potential zones and recommendation of artificial recharge structures for augmentation of groundwater resources in Vattamalaikarai Basin, South India. Environmental Earth Science, 79: 102. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-020-8832-9.

Biswas G, Garai T, Santra U. 2023. A possibility-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for artificial recharge structure selection using pentagonal fuzzy numbers. Decision Analytics Journal, 9: 100365. DOI: 10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100365.

Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L. 1995. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22: 763−770. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H.

Dörr F, Bauer J, Tran HV, et al. 2023. Vietnam's mekong delta- land subsidence due to groundwater over-exploitation. Wasserwirtschaft, 113: 52−56. DOI: 10.1007/s35147-023-1922-3.

Dubey RS, Chattopadhyay PB, Pal U. 2024. Identifying potential artificial recharge zone in an arid craton. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 27: 101338. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101338.

Fan ZR, Wang YY, OYang W, et al. 2023. Artificial groundwater recharge potential and recharge mode in the Shichuan River valley area. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 491−500. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2023.0049.

Gao W. 2013. Effect of long-distance raw water pipeline on typical water quality indicators. China Water & Wastewater, 29: 4. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.19853/j.zgjsps.1000-4602.2013.19.016.

Hammouri N, Al-Amoush H, Al-Raggad M, et al. 2014. Groundwater recharge zones mapping using GIS: A case study in Southern part of Jordan Valley, Jordan. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7: 2815−2829. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-013-0995-1.

Heng T, Chen GH. 2013. Application of hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) to time dependent quantum transport at zero and finite temperatures. The European Physical Journal B, 86: 411. DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2013-40333-7.

Houle ES, Livneh B, Kasprzyk JR. 2017. Exploring snow model parameter sensitivity using Sobol' variance decomposition. Environmental Modelling & Software, 89: 144−158. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.024.

Jamali MY, Namous M, SoumiaAmir. 2020. Impact of overexploitation of groundwater along the irrigated perimeter of Tadla, Oum Errabia Basin, Morocco. Desalination and Water Treatment, 195: 201−212. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2020.25877.

Jena S, Panda RK, Ramadas M, et al. 2020. Delineation of groundwater storage and recharge potential zones using RS-GIS-AHP: Application in arable land expansion. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 19: 100354. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100354.

Kadiri M, Zarhloule Y, Barkaoui A-e, et al. 2023. Identification of potential artificial groundwater recharge sites using GIS and the analytical hierarchy process: Case study of Tamellalt plain, Morocco. Hydrogeology Journal, 31: 1813−1828. DOI: 10.1007/s10040-023-02701-x.

Lian H, Sun Z, Xu C, et al. 2023. Groundwater level dynamic simulation and soil salinization prediction of the closed hydrogeological unit in the arid irrigation area. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 25: 815−834. DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2023.142.

Maqbool S, Singh V, Patley MK, et al. 2024. Evaluation of groundwater quality potential zones using AHP and WIOA models in Shopian District, Jammu and Kashmir, India: A GIS. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 16: 100488. DOI: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100488.

Martelli G, Granati C, Paiero G, et al. 2014. Artificial recharge of phreatic aquifer in the Mereto Di Tomba Area (Upper Friuli Plain). Procedia Engineering (Netherlands), 89: 1241−1248. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.427.

Mengstie L, Nebere A, Jothimani M, et al. 2024. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Addi Arkay, Ethiopia using GIS, remote sensing, and AHP. Quaternary Science Advances, 15: 100217. DOI: 10.1016/j.qsa.2024.100217.

Mishra U, Mohapatra AK, Mandal A, et al. 2023. Identification of potential artificial groundwater recharge sites in an alluvial setting: A coupled electrical resistivity tomography and sediment characterization study. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 20: 100875. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100875.

Mogaji KA, Omosuyi GO, Adelusi AO, et al. 2016. Application of GIS-based evidential belief function model to regional groundwater recharge potential zones Mapping in Hardrock Geologic Terrain. Environmental Processes, 3: 93−123. DOI: 10.1007/s40710-016-0126-6.

Rachdi L, Abdelkrim B, Atoui M, et al. 2024. Assessment of groundwater potential recharge areas using advanced decision models and spatial data: Applied to Sbeitla aquifer system, central Tunisia. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 27: 101316. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101316.

Raja Shekar P, Mathew A. 2023. Assessing groundwater potential zones and artificial recharge sites in the monsoon-fed Murredu river basin, India: An integrated approach using GIS, AHP, and Fuzzy-AHP. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 23: 100994. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100994.

Rani M, Joshi H, Kumar K, et al. 2019. Development of recharge and conservation site suitability model for groundwater retrieval and evaluation of artificial recharge potential in a complex hydro-geological spring-fed river basin. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12: 589. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-019-4784-3.

Sethuraman S, Alshahrani HM, Tamizhselvi A, et al. 2024. Assessment of coastal vulnerability using AHP and machine learning techniques. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 147: 105107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2024.105107.

Saaty RW. 1987a. The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9: 161−176. DOI: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.

Saaty TL. 1983. Introduction to a modeling of social decision processes. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 25: 105−107. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4754(83)90072-1.

Saaty TL. 1987b. How to handle dependence with the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling, 9: 369−376. DOI: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90494-5.

Sahaar SA, Niemann JD. 2020. Impact of regional characteristics on the estimation of root-zone soil moisture from the evaporative index or evaporative fraction. Agricultural Water Management, 238: 106225. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106225.

Salehi Shafa N, Babazadeh H, Aghayari F, et al. 2023. Optimal utilization of groundwater resources and artificial recharge system of Shahriar plain aquifer, Iran. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 129: 103358. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2023.103358.

Sandoval JA, Tiburan CL. 2019. Identification of potential artificial groundwater recharge sites in Mount Makiling Forest Reserve, Philippines using GIS and Analytical Hierarchy Process. Applied Geography, 105: 73−85. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.01.010.

Shahkarami N. 2024. Temporal analysis of land subsidence and groundwater depletion using the DInSAR and Kriging methods: A case study and insights. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 29(3): 04024011. DOI: 10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6130.

Song X, Zhang J, Zhan C, et al. 2015. Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications. Journal of Hydrology, 523: 739−757. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.013.

Subba Rao N, Gugulothu S, Das R. 2022. Deciphering artificial groundwater recharge suitability zones in the agricultural area of a river basin in Andhra Pradesh, India using geospatial techniques and analytical hierarchical process method. Catena, 212: 106085. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106085.

Wang HY, Song CQ, Wang JF, et al. 2024. A raster-based spatial clustering method with robustness to spatial outliers. Scientific Reports, 14: 4103. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53066-4.

Wang YZ, Ye NJ. 2008. Farmland drainage problems in the Huaibei Plain, Anhui Province. China Rural Water and Hydropower, (2): 5–7, 13. Available on https://irrigate.whu.edu.cn/CN/Y2008/V0/I2/5 (in Chinese)

Wu SJ, Tetzlaff D, Yang XQ, et al. 2022. Identifying dominant processes in time and space: Time-varying spatial sensitivity analysis for a grid-based nitrate model. Water Resources Research, 58: e2021WR031149. DOI: 10.1029/2021WR031149.

Xu YY, Lü HS, Yagci A, et al. 2024. Influence of groundwater on the propagation of meteorological drought to agricultural drought during crop growth periods: A case study in Huaibei Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 305: 109122. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109122.

Zhang YW. 2020. Evaluation of groundwater artificial recharge suitability in plain area of Daqing River Basin based on GIS - EWM. M. S. thesis, Jilin University.

Zaidi FK, Nazzal Y, Ahmed I, et al. 2015. Identification of potential artificial groundwater recharge zones in Northwestern Saudi Arabia using GIS and Boolean logic. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 111: 156−169. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.07.008.

Zhang H, Xu YX, Kanyerere T. 2020. A review of the managed aquifer recharge: Historical development, current situation and perspectives. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 118−119: 102887. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2020.102887.

Zhang YF, Wang YF, L, iu LX. 2001. Function mechanism between the drought and waterlogging disaster and the Soil-structure of the Shajiang soil in Huaibei Plain. Progress in Geography, 20: 169−176. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2001.02.010.

2305-7068/© Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)

Relative Articles

[1]	Jing-tao Shi, Ge Gao, Jun-jian Liu, Yu-ge Jiang, Bo Li, Xiao-yan Hao, Jun-chao Zhang, Zhao-yi Li, Huan Sun, 2025: Ecological vulnerability assessment and driving force analysis of small watersheds in Hilly Regions using sensitivity-resilience-pressure modeling, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 13, 209-224. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280050
[2]	Tran Vu Long, Nguyen Bach Thao, Dao Duc Bang, Kieu Thi Van Anh, Vu Thu Hien, Duong Thi Thanh Thuy, Tran Quang Tuan, Nguyen Van Hoang, Doan Anh Tuan, Dang Tran Trung, 2025: Application of the cumulative rainfall departure method in determination of deep groundwater recharge in Soc Trang Province, Vietnam, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 13, 180-192. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280048
[3]	Masoud H Hamed, Rebwar N Dara, Marios C Kirlas, 2024: Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a GIS-based DRASTIC method in the Erbil Dumpsite area (Kani Qirzhala), Central Erbil Basin, North Iraq, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 12, 16-33. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2024.9280003
[4]	Tian Nan, Chen Yue, Wen-geng Cao, En-lin Mu, Yang Ou, Zhen-sheng Lin, Wei Kang, 2023: Effective groundwater level recovery from mining reduction: Case study of Baoding and Shijiazhuang Plain area, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 278-293. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280023
[5]	Parisa Kazerani, Ali Naghi Ziaei, Kamran Davari, 2023: Determining safe yield and mapping water level zoning in groundwater resources of the Neishabour Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 47-54. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280005
[6]	Peng-yu Shi, Jian-jun Liu, Yi-jie Zong, Kai-qing Teng, Yu-ming Huang, Liang Xiao, 2023: Analytical solution for Non-Darcian effect on transient confined-unconfined flow in a confined aquifer, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 11, 365-378. doi: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280029
[7]	She-ming Chen, Hong-wei Liu, Fu-tian Liu, Jin-jie Miao, Xu Guo, Zhou Zhang, Wan-jun Jiang, 2022: Using time series analysis to assess tidal effect on coastal groundwater level in Southern Laizhou Bay, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 292-301. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.03.007
[8]	Hui-feng Yang, Rui-fang Meng, Xi-lin Bao, Wen-geng Cao, Ze-yan Li, Bu-yun Xu, 2022: Assessment of water level threshold for groundwater restoration and over-exploitation remediation the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 113-127. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.02.002
[9]	Vinay Kumar Gautam, Mahesh Kothari, P.K. Singh, S.R. Bhakar, K.K. Yadav, 2022: Analysis of groundwater level trend in Jakham River Basin of Southern Rajasthan, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 1-9. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.01.001
[10]	Han Zhang, Zong-yu Chen, Chang-yuan Tang, 2021: Quantifying groundwater recharge and discharge for the middle reach of Heihe River of China using isotope mass balance method, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 225-232. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.03.005
[11]	Abdulrahman Th Mohammad, Qassem H Jalut, Nadia L Abbas, 2020: Predicting groundwater level of wells in the Diyala River Basin in eastern Iraq using artificial neural network, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 87-96. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.01.009
[12]	SADIKI Moulay Lhassan, EL MANSOURI Bouabid, BENSEDDIK Badr, CHAO Jamal, KILI Malika, EL MEZOUARY Lhoussaine, 2019: Improvement of groundwater resources potential by artificial recharge technique: A case study of Charf El Akab aquifer in the Tangier region, Morocco, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 224-236. doi: DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.03.003
[13]	TIAN Xia, FEI Yu-hong, ZHANG Zhao-ji, LI Ya-song, DUN Yu, GUO Chun-yan, 2017: Analysis on hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater in strongly exploited area in Hutuo River Plain, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 130-139.
[14]	WU Ting-wen, WANG Li-huan, YANG Xiang-kui, 2017: Evaluation of groundwater potential and eco-geological environment quality in Sanjiang Plain of Heilongjiang Province, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 193-201.
[15]	SHANG Man-ting, LIU Pei-gui, LEI Chao, LIU Ming-chao, WU Liang, 2017: Effect of climate change on the trends of evaporation of phreatic water from bare soil in Huaibei Plain, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 213-221.
[16]	LIU Min, NIE Zhen-long, WANG Jin-zhe, WANG Li-fang, TIAN Yan-liang, 2016: An assessment of the carrying capacity of groundwater resources in North China Plain region–Analysis of potential for development, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 174-187.
[17]	NAN Tian, SHAO Jing-li, CUI Ya-li, 2016: Column test-based features analysis of clogging in artificial recharge of groundwater in Beijing, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 88-95.
[18]	GONG Xiao-ping, JIANG Guang-hui, CHEN Chang-jie, GUO Xiao-jiao, ZHANG Hua-sheng, 2015: Specific yield of phreatic variation zone in karst aquifer with the method of water level analysis, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 192-201.
[19]	YANG Yun, WU Jian-feng, LIU De-peng, 2015: Numerical modeling of water yield of mine in Yangzhuang Iron Mine, Anhui Province of China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 352-362.
[20]	HAN Mei, JIA Na, LI Ke, ZHAO Guo-xing, LIU Bing-bing, LIU Sheng-hua, LIU Jie, 2014: Analysis of bromate and bromide in drinking water by ion chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2, 48-53.