Analysis of travel time, sources of water and well protection zones with groundwater models

ZHOU Yang-xiao; Parvez Sarwer Hossain; Nico van der Moot

Volume 3 Issue 4

Dec. 2015

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering > 2015 > 3(4): 363-374

ZHOU Yang-xiao, Parvez Sarwer Hossain, Nico van der Moot. 2015: Analysis of travel time, sources of water and well protection zones with groundwater models. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3(4): 363-374.

Citation:

PDF( 24621 KB)

Analysis of travel time, sources of water and well protection zones with groundwater models

1UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands.2The Institution of Engineers, Bangladesh. 3Water Supply Company, Drenthe, The Netherlands

Publish Date: 2015-12-28

Abstract

Abstract

This study compares numerical models with analytical solutions in computing travel times and radius of protection zones for a pumping well located in an unconfined aquifer with uniform recharge and in a semi-confined aquifer. Numerical models were capable of delineating protection zones using particle tracking method in both cases. However, protection zones defined by travel time criterion can only protect small percent of source water to the well; large percent of source water is not protected which may pose a risk of pollution of source water to the well. The case study of Leggeloo well field in the Netherlands indicates that although a well field protection area was enforced in 1980s, elevated nitrate concentration has been monitored in the abstracted water since 1990s. The analysis of protection areas shows that the current protection area only protects 37.4% of recharge water to the well field. A large protection area must be adopted in order to safeguard the sustainable water supply for the local community
- Travel time,
- Sources of water,
- Protection zone,
- Groundwater models

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

European Environment Agency (EEA). 1999. Environmental assessment report No 1: Sustainable water use in Europe, Part 1: Sectoral use of water. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Chave P, Howard G, Schijven J, et al. 2006. Groundwater protection zones. In: Schmoll O, Howard G, J Chilton, Chorus I (eds) Protecting groundwater for health: managing the quality of drinking-water sources. London: IWA.

US Enviromental Protection Agency. 1994. Handbook, groundwater and wellhead protection. EPA/625/R-94/001. Washington DC: US EPA.

Hantush M S. 1964. Hydraulic of wells. New York: Advances in Hydroscience, Academic Press.

Bouwer H. 1993. Groundwater hydrology. McGraw-Hill series in water resources and environmental engineering. U.S.A.: Mcgraw- Hill College.

ZHOU Yang-xiao. 2011. Sources of water, travel times and protection areas for wells in semi-confined aquifers. Hydrogeology Journal, 19(7): 1285-1291.

Van Waegeningh H G. 1981. A proposal for the dimensions of protection areas. Science of the Total Environment, 21: 397-403.

Keely J F, Tsang C F. 1983. Velocity plots and capture zones of pumping centers for groundwater investigation. Ground Water, 21(6): 701-714.

China’s Agenda 21. 1994. White paper on China’s population, environment, and development in the 21st century. Beijing: China Environ?mental Science Press.

ZHOU Yang-xiao, Haitjema Henk. 2012. Approximate solutions for radial travel time and capture zone in unconfined aquifers. Groundwater, 50(5): 799-803.

ZHAN Hong-bing, BIAN Ai-guo. 2006. A method of calculating pumping induced leakage. Journal of Hydrology, 328(3):659-667.

Chiang W H, Kinzelbach W. 1994. PMPATH. An advective transport model for Processing Modflow and Modflow. Hamburg: Geological Survey of Hamburg, Germany.

HAN Zai-sheng. 1998. Groundwater for urban water supplies in northern China-An overview. Hydrogeology Journal, 6(3): 416-420.

US Enviromental Protection Agency. 1987. Guidelines for delineation of wellhead protection areas. EPA/440/6-87-010. Wash-ing??ton D.C.: US EPA.

Harbaugh A W, Banta E R, Hill M C, McDonald M G. 2000. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground water model-User guide to modularization concepts and the ground water flow process. Reston: US Geological Survey.

2305-7068/© Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Relative Articles

[1]	Wondesen Fikade Niway, Dagnachew Daniel Molla, Tarun Kumar Lohani, 2022: Holistic approach of GIS based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and WetSpass models to evaluate groundwater potential in Gelana watershed of Ethiopia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 138-152. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.02.004
[2]	Shima Nasiri, Hossein Ansari, Ali Naghi Ziaei, 2022: Determination of water balance equation components in irrigated agricultural watersheds using SWAT and MODFLOW models : A case study of Samalqan plain in Iran, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 44-56. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.01.005
[3]	Gang Qiao, Feng-dan Yu, Wen-ke Wang, Jun Zhang, Hua-qing Chen, 2022: Thermodynamic transport mechanism of water freezing-thawing in the vadose zone in the alpine meadow of the Tibet Plateau, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 302-310. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.03.008
[4]	She-ming Chen, Hong-wei Liu, Fu-tian Liu, Jin-jie Miao, Xu Guo, Zhou Zhang, Wan-jun Jiang, 2022: Using time series analysis to assess tidal effect on coastal groundwater level in Southern Laizhou Bay, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 292-301. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.03.007
[5]	Khan Tanzeel, Akhtar Malik Muhammad, Malghani Gohram, Akhtar Rabia, 2022: Comparative analysis of bacterial contamination in tap and groundwater: A case study on water quality of Quetta City, an arid zone in Pakistan, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 10, 153-165. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2022.02.005
[6]	O Boulariah, PA Mikhailov, A Longobardi, AN Elizariev, SG Aksenov, 2021: Assessment of prediction performances of stochastic models: Monthly groundwater level prediction in Southern Italy, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 161-170. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.02.008
[7]	Xue-ru Wen, Yan-pei Cheng, Jian-kang Zhang, Hua Dong, 2021: Ecological function zoning and protection of groundwater in Asia, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 9, 359-368. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.04.009
[8]	Liu YANG, Ying-ping ZHANG, Xue-ru WEN, Li-xin PEI, Bing LIU, 2020: Characteristics of groundwater and urban emergency water sources optimazation in Luoyang, China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8, 298-304. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2020.03.010
[9]	LI Yang, KANG Feng-Xin, ZOU An-de, 2019: Isotope analysis of nitrate pollution sources in groundwater of Dong’e geohydrological unit, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 7, 145-154.
[10]	SUN Bin, YU Da-lu, 2018: Study on Jinan urban construction planning based on the protection of karst landscape, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 6, 280-292. doi: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2018.04.004
[11]	ZHANG Chun-chao, LI Xiang-quan, GAO Ming, HOU Xin-wei, LIU Ling-xia, WANG Zhen-xing, MA Jian-fei, 2017: Exploitation of groundwater resources and protection of wetland in the Yuqia Basin, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 5, 222-234.
[12]	WANG Ying, CHEN Zong-yu, 2016: Responses of groundwater system to water development in northern China, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 69-80.
[13]	ZHOU Zhi-chao, WANG Ju, SU Rui, GUO Yong-hai, LI Jie-biao, JI Rui-li, ZHANG Ming, DONG Jian-nan, 2016: Study on the residence time of deep groundwater for high-level radioactive waste geological disposal, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 4, 52-59.
[14]	ZHOU Li-ling, CHENG Zhe, DUAN Lei, WANG Wen-ke, 2015: Distribution of groundwater salinity and formation mechanism of fresh groundwater in an arid desert transition zone, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 268-279.
[15]	GONG Xiao-ping, JIANG Guang-hui, CHEN Chang-jie, GUO Xiao-jiao, ZHANG Hua-sheng, 2015: Specific yield of phreatic variation zone in karst aquifer with the method of water level analysis, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 192-201.
[16]	WEI Jia-hua, CHU Hai-bo, WANG Rong, JIANG Yuan, 2015: Numerical simulation of karst groundwater system for discharge prediction and protection design of spring in Fangshan District, Beijing, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 3, 316-330.
[17]	, 2013: ESR Signal Intensity and Crystallinity of Quartz from Three Major Asian Dust Sources: Implication for Tracing the Provenances of Eolian Dust, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 53-67.
[18]	Cui-ling Wang, Chang-li Liu, Ya-jie Pang, Li-xin Pei, Yun Zhang, 2013: Adsorption Behavior of Hexavalent Chromium in Vadose Zone, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 83-88.
[19]	Yu Liu, 2013: Comparison of Three Brine Migration Models in Groudwater, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 70-73.
[20]	Jingli Shao, Yali Cui, Yunzhang Zhao, 2013: A Study on Infiltration and Groundwater Development in the Influent Zone of the Perched Lower Yellow River, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 1, 46-53.